San Antonio Express-News

Jan. 6 panel: GOP lawmakers played role in election scheme

- By Farnoush Amiri

WASHINGTON — Rioters who smashed their way into the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, succeeded — at least temporaril­y — in delaying the certificat­ion of Joe Biden’s election to the White House.

Hours before, Rep. Jim Jordan had been trying to achieve the same thing.

Texting with then-white House chief of staff Mark Meadows, a close ally and friend, at nearly midnight on Jan. 5, Jordan offered a legal rationale for what President Donald Trump was publicly demanding — that Vice President Mike Pence, in his ceremonial role presiding over the electoral count, somehow assert the authority to reject electors from Biden-won states.

Pence “should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitu­tional as no electoral votes at all,” Jordan wrote.

“I have pushed for this,” Meadows replied. “Not sure it is going to happen.”

The text exchange, in an April 22 court filing from the congressio­nal panel investigat­ing the Jan. 6 riot, is in a batch of startling evidence that shows the deep involvemen­t of some House Republican­s in Trump’s desperate attempt to stay in power. A review of the evidence finds new details about how, long before the attack on the Capitol unfolded, several GOP lawmakers were participat­ing directly in Trump’s campaign to reverse the results of a free and fair election.

It’s a connection that members of the House Jan. 6 committee are making explicit as they prepare to launch public hearings in June. The Republican­s plotting with Trump and the rioters who attacked the Capitol were aligned in their goals, if not the mob’s violent tactics, creating a convergenc­e that nearly upended the nation’s peaceful transfer of power.

“It appears that a significan­t number of House members and a few senators had more than just a passing role in what went on,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, told the Associated Press last week.

Since launching its investigat­ion last summer, the Jan. 6 panel has been slowly gaining new details about what lawmakers said and did in the weeks before the insurrecti­on. Members have asked three GOP lawmakers — Jordan of Ohio, Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvan­ia and House Minority Leader Kevin Mccarthy of California — to testify voluntaril­y. All have refused. Other lawmakers could be called in the coming days.

So far, the Jan. 6 committee has refrained from issuing subpoenas to lawmakers, fearing the repercussi­ons of such an extraordin­ary step. But the lack of cooperatio­n from lawmakers hasn’t prevented the panel from obtaining new informatio­n about their actions.

The latest court document, submitted in response to a lawsuit from Meadows, contained excerpts from just a handful of the more than 930 interviews the Jan. 6 panel has conducted. It includes informatio­n on several high-level meetings nearly a dozen House Republican­s attended where Trump’s allies flirted with ways to give him another term.

Among the ideas: naming fake slates of electors in seven swing states, declaring martial law and seizing voting machines.

Pressure from lawmakers and the White House on the Justice Department is among several areas of inquiry in the Jan. 6 investigat­ion. Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democratic member of the panel from Maryland, has hinted there are more revelation­s to come.

“As the mob smashed our windows, bloodied our police and stormed the Capitol, Trump and his accomplice­s plotted to destroy Biden’s majority in the electoral college and overthrow our constituti­onal order,” Raskin tweeted last week.

When the results of the panel’s investigat­ion come out, Raskin predicted, “America will see how the coup and insurrecti­on converged.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States