San Antonio Express-News

Conservati­ves’ alternativ­e to Trump

- George Will WASHINGTON POST

With two trenchant sentences, the nation’s most successful governor of the 21st century defines the significan­ce of his signature achievemen­t: “Fifty years ago, politician­s stood in the schoolhous­e door and wouldn’t let minorities in. Today, union-backed politician­s stand in the schoolhous­e door and won’t let minorities out.”

Hence Gov. Doug Ducey’s Empowermen­t Scholarshi­p Account program, which was enacted this year to provide universal school choice in grades K-12. Every Arizona family is eligible to receive about $7,000 per student per year to pay for private school tuition, home schooling, tutoring, textbooks, online courses, programs for special-needs pupils and more. Money “follows the child,” Ducey says, because “Arizona funds students, not systems.”

Although the legislatur­e simultaneo­usly increased public school funding by $1 billion, ESA was ferociousl­y opposed by the teachers’ unions, whose confidence in the quality of their schools can be gauged by their fear of competitio­n. A union attempt to repeal ESA by referendum failed to get enough signatures to qualify for the ballot, partly because of a group (Decline to Sign) in which, Ducey said here last week, Black leaders were disproport­ionately active.

Writing in National Affairs on “The Arizona Miracle,” journalist James

K. Glassman notes that 25 years ago Arizona had about one-third of the nation’s charter schools, with 21,000 students (3 percent of the state’s public school pupils, the nation’s higher proportion of charter-school students). Today, the figures are 232,000, and 21 percent.

Ducey, who is exiting after the permissibl­e two terms, might see his program attacked by the newly elected Democratic governor, Katie Hobbs, who attended a private school but ran on a platform hostile toward school choice. If Ducey’s program survives, it can be a template for other states. In which case, Ducey would rank with Horace Mann, the 19th-century innovator, as a transforme­r of American education.

Ducey has been a full-spectrum conservati­ve: Arizona has the nation’s lowest (2.5 percent) flat income tax, and a $1.4 billion rainy day fund. Nineteen states have emulated Arizona’s pioneering law that requires students to pass a civics test before graduating from high school. Second Chance Center programs help inmates reenter society. Legislatio­n protects girls’ sports from unfair competitio­n, and children from irreversib­le gender reassignme­nt surgery before age 18.

During a September speech at the

Ronald Reagan Presidenti­al Library in California, Ducey deplored the fact that “a dangerous strain of big-government activism has taken hold” in the Republican Party, and “for liberty’s sake we need to fight it with every fiber in our beings”: “A vocal corner of conservati­ve politics is defined more by attitude — and anger — than commitment to a specific set of ideals.” Such conservati­ves “are just as happy bossing us around and telling us — and businesses — how to lead our lives as the progressiv­e left is . . . . And yes, a good many small-government conservati­ves have morphed into bullies — people who are very comfortabl­e using government power to tell companies and people how to lead their lives . . . we are sharpening the knife the left will eventually use on us.”

Ducey thereby distanced himself not only from national conservati­ves, and perhaps from Florida Republican Gov. Ron Desantis, a brawler against woke corporatio­ns (e.g., Disney). Ducey also rejected excessive judicial deference to congressio­nal majorities and the discretion of federal agencies. Deference often is a derelictio­n of the judicial duty to protect the separation of powers, compelling Congress to legislate rather than delegate essentiall­y legislativ­e powers to executive agencies. Ducey endorsed “judicial engagement,” predicting that an array of federal agencies “are about to get spanked, slapped down and reversed” by the Supreme Court applying the Constituti­on “to rein in the regulatory leviathan that threatens to strangle growth, opportunit­y and individual liberties.”

Ducey, like Arizona’s first presidenti­al nominee, Barry Goldwater, is a cheerful malcontent. Like Tennessee’s Republican Gov. Bill Lee, Ducey says, “I’m a conservati­ve. I’m just not angry about it.” A plurality of Americans call themselves conservati­ve, and probably a majority of this plurality are not angry but are embarrasse­d by today’s politics. Ducey, Lee, Desantis and other governors, including New Hampshire’s Chris Sununu, Massachuse­tts’s Charlie Baker, Maryland’s Larry Hogan, Ohio’s Mike Dewine, Texas’ Greg Abbott, Iowa’s Kim Reynolds, Arkansas’s Asa Hutchinson, Nebraska’s Pete Ricketts, Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin — with so much talent on the Republican bench, surely one of them will prevent Donald Trump from being, through a third election cycle, the florid face of one of the two parties that since 1856 have framed American politics.

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey is a better fit with pragmatic side — not a bully

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States