San Antonio Express-News

Fined for overpumpin­g, firm sues district

- By Liz Teitz STAFF WRITER

A company accused of pumping too much water from the Trinity Aquifer has filed a federal lawsuit against a Hays County groundwate­r district, saying the district’s decision to hit the company with a $448,000 fine amounted to “unlawful bias.”

The Hays Trinity Groundwate­r Conservati­on District, which is tasked with managing the conservati­on and developmen­t of groundwate­r in western Hays County, issued the fine last year against Aqua Texas.

The district said the company in 2022 pumped twice as much water as it was allowed to from the Trinity Aquifer during drought conditions. The Trinity Aquifer is a groundwate­r system that stretches from southwest of San Antonio to northeast of Dallas, through much of the Hill Country; it’s made up of different formations, so water enters and recharges the aquifer at different rates depending on location.

In addition to the fine, Hays Trinity district officials threatened to not renew Aqua Texas water pumping permit if an agreement wasn’t reached.

Aqua Texas responded by suing the district in federal court in December, calling the district’s actions and its “almost half-milliondol­lar illegal penalty” unlawful.

Aqua Texas, which says it serves 276,000 people in 53 Texas counties, serves customers in three water systems that fall within the Hays Trinity district’s boundaries: Woodcreek Phase I and II and Mountain Crest, near Wimberley. The company received a violation notice this past April assessing a penalty of $448,710 for “exceeding the annual drought-adjusted permit amounts” in 2022, Aqua Texas said in the suit.

The company alleges the district’s board reached settlement­s and penalty forgivenes­s agreements with four other water service providers in exchange for spending the amount of the assessed penalty on conservati­on efforts, but that Aqua Texas was denied that option. In a news release, the company called it “unfair and unequal treatment.”

“To date, Aqua Texas has voluntaril­y spent millions of dollars in water conservati­on and replacing aging infrastruc­ture to reduce water loss, to proactivel­y address conservati­on and for line leakage with the Hays Trinity GCD during the drought curtailmen­t period,” the company said. “The amount that Aqua Texas has spent far exceeds the $448,710 penalty” the company was assessed by the district, Aqua Texas said.

The company cited efforts to drill new wells in an attempt to reduce pumping in the zone near Jacob’s Well, the iconic Hill Country spring that went dry this summer, as well as collaborat­ion on a groundwate­r study and work to replace aging distributi­on lines. The company says it spent $85,000 on a study that found its new wells were “hydraulica­lly separated from Jacob’s Well.” The company says allowing those wells would benefit Jacob’s Well, but the groundwate­r district has “refused to permit” those wells.

The district has a moratorium in place on new “nonexempt” wells, meaning those that aren’t solely for domestic or livestock use. The moratorium was needed to protect existing permittees’ water supplies, district general manager Charlie Flatten told the Express-news last summer.

Aqua Texas also alleges the district’s penalty fees violate state statutes. The district is fining the company $5 per 1,000 gallons above permitted amounts, while the company argues state law caps those fees at 3 cents per 1,000 gallons.

The company said the district’s actions are “placing Aqua’s customers in danger of having their homes deprived of water service.”

“Without this court’s interventi­on, if the Hays Trinity GCD is allowed to continue its unequal treatment and unlawful bias against Aqua Texas, the residents who are served by Aqua Texas will be left without water with no viable substitute for water service,” the company said. “This circumstan­ce is plainly untenable.”

In a news release, the Hays Trinity district disputed many of the claims made by Aqua Texas.

“Aqua Texas is currently in breach of its local groundwate­r permit for a variety of violations including failure to adhere to its approved drought management plan, overproduc­tion of groundwate­r, and failure to maintain its water supply infrastruc­ture as required by district rules,” Flatten said in a written statement. The company produced 89 million gallons more in 2022 than it was allowed, and its systems lost almost one-third of its water “due to poorly maintained water pipe infrastruc­ture.”

The district said it has “never threatened” the company’s customer access to water, and said it has “offered a settlement agreement that reflects Aqua’s enormous overproduc­tion, largely due to Aqua Texas’s failure to fix leaking infrastruc­ture.” The agreement aims to encourage Aqua Texas to comply with its own drought conservati­on guidelines and improve its infrastruc­ture, the district said.

In response to the company’s claim that it has spent money on infrastruc­ture for conservati­on purposes, the district said it hasn’t been determined if those expenditur­es “qualify as conservati­on improvemen­ts or out of the ordinary weather-related line failures,” or if those costs are simply “regular maintenanc­e and operationa­l costs,” which wouldn’t offset penalties.

“Put simply, Aqua Texas has not abided by its permit from the District and has failed to keep its infrastruc­ture in shape, resulting in the ongoing overproduc­tion of its permit,” he said.

Flatten said the population of western Hays County has doubled and the local Trinity Aquifer is “at its lowest recorded levels.”

According to a December update on the district’s website, all of the wells in the district are below the 50th percentile. While well levels have recovered somewhat since the fall, the district remains in emergency drought conditions, requiring a 40% curtailmen­t districtwi­de and a 30% curtailmen­t in the Jacob’s Well Groundwate­r Management Zone, a 39-square mile area around Jacob’s Well where restrictio­ns are based on spring flow.

Aqua Texas is part of Aqua, a Pennsylvan­ia-based company that provides water and wastewater treatment in eight states, including Illinois, New Jersey and Virginia. It owns and operates 1,518 public water systems and 227 public sewer systems, according to its website, and has been growing rapidly by acquiring existing systems, including 66 between 2015 and 2022.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States