San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)
Players, owners must plan now
Time is growing short for the NHL to meet its target of launching the 2020-21 season on Jan. 1, and the list of obstacles is growing longer. Without an agreement between the league and the NHL Players’ Association by next week, the opener could be pushed back another month, slashing the schedule below the hoped-for 60 to 62 games.
Negotiations hit some snags recently. According to people familiar with the discussions but not authorized to speak publicly, Commissioner Gary Bettman asked players to defer an additional 13 percent of their salaries next season beyond the 10 percent deferral they accepted in July. Players will eventually get that money back, but without interest. Bettman also proposed raising the escrow cap in each of the last three years of the labor agreement from 6 percent to 9. Players previously agreed to cap escrow at 20 percent for 2020-21, at 14 to 18 in 2021-22, and at 10 in 2022-23.
Players held a conference call Wednesday and, predictably, were unhappy about Bettman’s efforts to change terms of the four-month-old labor deal to accommodate clubs’ pandemic-deflated cash flow. But players want to play and owners want the league to regain a presence, so there’s room for a compromise that could include Bettman sweetening the players’ pot if revenues return to anything close to pre-pandemic levels.
They’ll have to find common ground quickly to be up and running by New Year’s Day, which is already a month later than Bettman had hoped. The seven teams that missed the expanded playoffs last season and have been off the ice since early March — a group that includes the Kings and Ducks — will be allowed to start training camp a week early and have a three-week camp. To open on Jan. 1, they’d have to start around Dec. 11, followed a week later by the other 24 teams. There’s little time to waste because players who went overseas will have to comply with quarantine requirements in their team’s home city before they can take to the ice.
“The focus is still very much on Jan. 1, and the league and players are committed to making that happen,” said Kelly Cheeseman, chief operating officer of AEG, the Kings’ parent company. “That said, we’re going to have to make some decisions here in the next week or two, and we’re excited to make those decisions.”
Having games means having to make decisions. That’s good. But the NHL’S startup issues are more complex than those faced by the NBA, which crowned the Lakers as champions nearly two weeks after the Tampa
Bay Lightning won the Stanley Cup but will return before the NHL, on Dec. 22.
Restrictions on nonessential crossings of the U.s.canada border are a major problem for the NHL. The NBA has one team in Canada, the Toronto Raptors, and relocated them to Tampa, Fla., on Friday for the start of the season.
“Obviously, we’re not going to move all seven Canadian franchises south of the 49th Parallel,” Bettman said during the recent Paley International Council Summit. The NHL is expected to temporarily realign and create an all-canadian division with intradivision play. U.s.-based teams will play regionally focused schedules to minimize travel.
Playing in tightly controlled bubbles like those created in Edmonton and Toronto during the playoffs is a nonstarter because players don’t want to be away from loved ones for an entire season. A hub system is a possibility.
“You’ll play for 10 to 12 days. You’ll play a bunch of games without traveling. You’ll go back, go home for a week, be with your family,” Bettman said. “We’ll have our testing protocols and all the other things you need. It’s not going to be quite as effective as a bubble, but we think we can, if we go this route, minimize the risks to the extent practical and sensible.”
Playing in home arenas remains owners’ preference.
The NHL’S financial problems are intensified by its dependence on ticket revenues, one consequence of a U.S. TV deal that isn’t as lucrative as those negotiated by the NFL, NBA and MLB. According to statista.com, gate revenue made up 36.6 percent of all NHL revenues in 2018-19; that doesn’t include sales of concessions and merchandise at games. With wide distribution of a coronavirus vaccine likely a few months away, the entire season could be played without fans, a blow to clubs’ bottom lines.
Another complication is that playing fewer than 70 games would obligate teams to give back some of their local TV rights fees. That’s an unpleasant prospect, but playing even a reduced number of games and keeping some broadcast and sponsor revenues would be better than getting no revenues at all.
As recently as late September, before Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final, Bettman said he anticipated the 2020-21 season would feature a full, 82-game schedule. That was never realistic. Like the rest of us, he has had to become flexible. That should apply to both sides as they negotiate terms for the upcoming season.