San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

BOARD APPROVES FINES FOR SOME FALSE ALARMS

Repeat offenders in unincorpor­ated areas to face financial penalty

- CITY NEWS SERVICE

The Board of Supervisor­s on Jan. 12 formally approved imposing fines on Riverside County residents and businesses using fire, burglar and other alarms that are repeatedly triggered in unincorpor­ated communitie­s without justificat­ion, tying up first responders.

The “False Alarm Ordinance” was adopted on a unanimous vote and takes effect in February.

The measure had been discussed in previous years, but the board never reached the point of actually voting to enact it. The ordinance is a result of lengthy research by the county sheriff ’s and fire department­s, as well as the Office of County Counsel.

“False alarms consume public safety resources and can increase response times for legitimate emergencie­s,” according to an Executive Office statement. “A false alarm ordinance could reduce the number of false alarms and the time spent responding to them.”

The measure draws from provisions contained in similar ordinances on the books in the cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Palm Springs and Riverside.

“This is something we’ve seen a lot of,” Supervisor Jeff Hewitt said when the proposal came before the board last month. “It’s a tricky one, so we’ll see how it works. Hopefully it doesn’t end up making things cost too much (for businesses and other alarm users).”

Data compiled for the board showed that in 2016, sheriff ’s deputies were sent to investigat­e 15,172 alarm calls in unincorpor­ated communitie­s, and of those, 13,461 — 88 percent — were determined to be false, while 1,674 were canceled before deputies reached the scene. Only 37 alarms were verified as requiring immediate attention.

The fire department did not provide composite numbers on calls, but noted that in 2017, crews were dispatched to 2,662 false alarms.

Under the ordinance, any time deputies or firefighte­rs go to a call and determine the alarm to be false, the person or entity whose home or business caused the alarm will receive a written warning. A second call for the same reason will result in a warning that a penalty will be assessed if there is a third call.

A third false alarm will mean a fine of $50. A fourth call will lead to a fine of $100, a fifth call $150, and for every call after that $200. The penalties will be part of the county’s anti-public nuisance code.

Recipients of fines will be entitled to an appeals process, initially via an “Alarm Appeals Officer,” and after that, the courts.

If an alarm company’s faulty system is found to be the cause of the alarms, it too could be held liable.

The ordinance also specifies that all audible security alarms have an automatic deactivati­on feature that makes them stop sounding after 15 minutes, and it contains a provision mandating that companies make at least two attempts to contact the property owner or alarm user before notifying law enforcemen­t of the alarm.

In 1996, the county establishe­d an ordinance seeking to fine alarm companies for false activation­s, but several providers sued, and the ordinance was nullified. The current ordinance has been courtteste­d thanks to municipali­ties passing their own regulation­s, all of which have withstood scrutiny.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States