San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

STUDIES SEEK BEST RAIL ROUTE

Bluff collapses in Del Mar illustrate the need to move tracks inland; agencies work on stabilizat­ion in meantime

- BY PHIL DIEHL

A tall, blue drilling rig began taking soil samples beneath the hilly streets of upper Del Mar this month, the first of a lot of digging needed to eventually move the railroad tracks off the crumbling coastal bluffs.

Five potential inland routes, all involving tunnels or a deep trench beneath the city, have been identified and the geotechnic­al investigat­ion under way will help identify the best one, said Linda Culp, a principal planner at the San Diego Associatio­n of Government­s, the regional planning agency.

“We don’t know the particular alignment yet,” Culp said. “This gets us started. This is the first time (for soil samples), but it won’t be the last. We’ll probably come back again and again.”

The proposed new route would replace about 1.7 miles of the railroad installed on the steep coastal bluffs about 1912. Since then, erosion has been eating away the shoreline at the average rate of 6 inches annually, creeping ever closer to the tracks.

Del Mar residents and city officials have encouraged SANDAG and the North County Transit District

for years to find a new route.

“A replacemen­t track without severe bends and with double track away from the fragile coastal Del Mar south bluffs is long overdue,” Mayor Terry Gaasterlan­d said by email Thursday.

“It is impossible to safeguard the route without ... (building) new structures on the bluff,” she said. “Those need to be minimized. Since safety cannot be compromise­d, that adds even more pressure to select, fund and construct a new route. We need to align federal and state resources quickly to get it done.”

SANDAG and NCTD have been working for 20 years on a series of projects to stabilize the tracks where they are. That effort is expected to continue for at least another decade or longer, while the agencies plan, design and build the new route.

In January, workers completed a fourth phase of the stabilizat­ion effort. So far they have added more than 230 concrete-and-steel support columns extending 60 feet into the ground, along with retaining walls, drainage ditches and other structures since 2003.

A fifth phase of stabilizat­ion work is planned and funded to be

gin in 2023.

However, a large bluff collapse Feb. 28 near Fourth Street showed that two years might be too long to wait. SANDAG now plans to speed up some elements of the next phase, such as installing additional support columns and retaining walls, and do that in the next few months.

The late February collapse brought the edge of the cliff to within 35 feet of railroad ties at one point, SANDAG officials said. As a result, rail traffic there is limited to 15 mph for passenger trains and 10 mph for freight trains. The slow spot creates a bottleneck and impedes traffic on the busy coastal rail route, which stretches 351 miles from San Diego to San Luis Obispo.

Transit officials and planners have met daily since the collapse to outline the design, choose a contractor and locate the materials needed for the repairs, said John Haggerty, SANDAG’S director of engineerin­g and constructi­on.

Preliminar­y work is planned for March 13 and 14, which is a regularly scheduled weekend suspension of rail service for maintenanc­e and constructi­on. The workers probably will remove some of the loose material remaining at the top of the cliff and take soil samples to help plan constructi­on, Haggerty said Thursday.

Some of the fifth phase of stabilizat­ion work probably will be left for 2023, as originally planned, he said.

The sixth and final phase of stabilizat­ion work has not been scheduled and is probably several more years away, but that’s intended to keep the tracks safe on the coast until the new inland route is built. Together, the fifth and sixth phases are expected to cost about $100 million.

The long-term goal of the stabilizat­ion project has always been to keep the tracks safe until an inland route can be built.

Transit and planning officials have said from the beginning that the route will require tunnels. Constructi­on will cost $3 billion or more and take 10 years. Approval from the various federal and state agencies, including the California Coastal Commission, will take years before constructi­on can start.

Funding is another huge hurdle and is likely to require the passage of a ballot measure. That will take widespread public support and significan­t political will among local and state elected officials.

“The rail service through Del Mar supports countless jobs and economic activity throughout the region, so it’s critically important that we protect the corridor and develop a new route,” Rep. Mike Levin, D-san Juan Capistrano, whose district includes Oceanside and the NCTD headquarte­rs.

“I was proud to help secure federal funding for bluff stabilizat­ion, and as we consider infrastruc­ture legislatio­n in Congress, one of my top priorities is securing additional federal funding to advance the relocation project,” Levin said. “I’ll continue to work with local, state, and federal partners to maintain the rail service through this corridor for generation­s to come.”

Recent collapses have increased the attention on efforts to find a new route. But the search continues at the same steady pace.

The soil tests now under way were scheduled well before the February bluff failure.

Thursday morning, a crew from Tri-county

Drilling, a subcontrac­tor, was working in the 400 block of Avenida Primavera, a narrow street with a clear view of the brilliant blue Pacific Ocean in the distance. It was the first of four locations to be tested through March 12, with two to three days at each spot.

By noon, the workers had drilled a little more than 100 feet deep, with plans to go to 200 feet, using a method called “mud rotary drilling.” The crew stopped every 5 feet to pull up a sample, a narrow 3inch cylinder of soil, that was bagged and tagged for analysis at a laboratory, said Pro-deep Singh, a geotechnic­al engineer at the site. Afterward, the hole was to be filled with a concrete slurry.

The railroad’s new route will be at roughly the same level as the existing tracks, which requires tunneling horizontal­ly beneath the hills of the city. At Thursday’s test site, the deepest samples were taken from about 200 feet or about the level of the proposed tunnel.

Soil samples will help determine the costs and methods of constructi­on, Haggerty said. The sandy coastal soils that make the bluffs so fragile could aid the excavation and be an advantage for the new route.

“A lot of the cost is based on the tunneling method you would use and how long it would take,” he said.

The new route would have a number of advantages in addition to avoiding the crumbling coast.

Trains could go faster because there are no crossings or other obstacles. The route would be shorter and straighter, which also would reduce travel time.

And a second set of tracks will be built, which will increase the railroad’s capacity and allow trains to pass each other in that area.

philip.diehl@sduniontri­bune.com

 ?? JARROD VALLIERE U-T ?? Workers from Tri-county Drilling take soil samples to conduct studies for potential routes for the Del Mar railroad tracks.
JARROD VALLIERE U-T Workers from Tri-county Drilling take soil samples to conduct studies for potential routes for the Del Mar railroad tracks.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States