San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

IS A WEALTH TAX NEEDED?

-

Sen. Elizabeth Warren and others argue COVID has created massive inequality and it is needed to balance the scales.

ECONOMISTS NO

Wealth taxes are neither simple to administer nor to collect. Individual­s targeted by this proposal have numerous investment­s and asset holdings for which assigning a value is difficult. These might include unique real estate properties and privately held businesses, all of which would need to be valued annually. Additional Internal Revenue Service resources would be required to audit the tax returns of wealthy individual­s. Less cumbersome approaches exist to collect more in taxes from the super-wealthy.

YES

The downturn in the economy caused by the pandemic has particular­ly hurt those at the lower end of the income distributi­on, as their jobs were the ones most affected. At the same time, most of those at the upper end were able to keep their jobs and also likely benefited from the surge in the stock market. A wealth tax would help rebalance the economy by generating tax revenue that could be used for programs to help those most negatively affected.

YES

It makes little sense to offer the COVID-19 relief package, and then ask these same recipients to assume the burden of repayment. Given the huge cost of funding government programs, it is worthwhile to review and explore taxing those who can better absorb the cost, and who have benefited greatly from their lives in the USA. A wealth tax is one idea, but so would be an increase in capital gains tax, addressing loopholes and eliminatin­g the corporate tax breaks passed in the Trump era.

NO

Alternativ­e minimum taxes for those who are able to use tax shields and faux losses, are a good idea, as are significan­t estate taxes, which nail you after you’re gone, but not annual wealth taxes on those who have created some of the most productive jobs in our country. While some superwealt­hy icons may hoard their wealth, others like Bill Gates spend it on many worthwhile causes. Politician­s should not be allowed to intercept such decisions or redirect to their chosen causes.

EXECUTIVES YES

We are seeing huge gains in personal wealth for a select few Americans. Wealth that is far beyond “passing something onto their children.” When we discuss individual­s worth billions of dollars we are far from stifling hard work and creativity. Instead, it is excessive wealth that should be shared with the less fortunate. With huge deficit spending due to the pandemic, now is the opportune time to implement the Warren Ultra Millionair­e Tax.

NO

Most European countries that had wealth taxes have abandoned it since they raised less revenue compared to the cost and were easily avoided by millionair­es and billionair­es. At that income level, you can find and exploit loopholes or leave the country. We are a free market economy and by taxing both assets and income, we could harm our economy by disincenti­vizing investment­s and innovation. If a wealth tax is implemente­d, what stops the threshold from lowering? The middle class will likely be the ones feeling the squeeze thus widening the income gap further.

YES

Wealth taxes only impact the uberwealth­y. What is the difference between a lifestyle with $40 million and $400 million? Or $4 billion? Bigger vacation homes and yachts? Nothing substantiv­e. Once an individual has amassed substantia­l wealth, the interest alone supports generation­s (that did nothing to earn it). Those that had the opportunit­y to earn a fortune should feel obliged to help enable others to do the same. No doubt wealth taxes are hard to administer but can enact economic justice.

NO

Even Janet Yellen has proclaimed this tax idea as unworkable. It taxes yet unrealized capital gains, creates enforcemen­t nightmares for the IRS, and will eventually create a police state to enforce it. Of the 15 countries that have tried wealth taxes, 11 have abandoned them. It will grow into much more than a tax on ultra-millionair­es, just watch. In the first two decades, the $50 million becomes $5 million, then $500,000. Dead on arrival.

 ??  ??
 ?? SUSAN WALSH AP ?? Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-mass., introduced a new wealth tax bill recently that she calls the “Ultra Millionair­e Tax.” The legislatio­n would create a 2 percent annual levy on wealth over $50 million and 3 percent on wealth over $1 billion. Warren, and other lawmakers, argue COVID-19 has created massive inequality and a wealth tax is needed to balance the scales. Most polls conducted of Americans show they support the idea.
SUSAN WALSH AP Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-mass., introduced a new wealth tax bill recently that she calls the “Ultra Millionair­e Tax.” The legislatio­n would create a 2 percent annual levy on wealth over $50 million and 3 percent on wealth over $1 billion. Warren, and other lawmakers, argue COVID-19 has created massive inequality and a wealth tax is needed to balance the scales. Most polls conducted of Americans show they support the idea.
 ??  ?? Bob Rauch
R.A. Rauch & Associates
Bob Rauch R.A. Rauch & Associates
 ??  ?? Alan Gin
University of San Diego
Alan Gin University of San Diego
 ??  ?? David Ely
San Diego State University
David Ely San Diego State University
 ??  ?? Gary London
London Moeder Advisors
Gary London London Moeder Advisors
 ??  ?? Jamie Moraga
Intellisol­utions
Jamie Moraga Intellisol­utions
 ??  ?? Austin Neudecker
Weave Growth
Austin Neudecker Weave Growth
 ??  ?? Phil Blair
Manpower
Phil Blair Manpower
 ??  ?? Norm Miller
University of San Diego
Norm Miller University of San Diego

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States