San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

CHANGE MAY ALLOW SCIENTISTS TO GROW HUMAN EMBRYOS LONGER

Guidelines removing 14-day limit conflict with some laws

- BY MARIA CHENG Cheng writes for The Associated Press.

New guidelines released Wednesday remove a decades-old barrier to stem cell research, recommendi­ng that researcher­s be allowed to grow human embryos longer under limited conditions.

The “14-day rule,” an internatio­nal ethical standard that limits laboratory studies of human embryos, has been in place for decades and has been written into law in countries including Britain and Australia. Scientists previously have been required to destroy human embryos grown in a lab before they reach 14 days.

Some researcher­s have favored revising the rule to further study the developmen­t process while opponents say such experiment­s at any stage cross a moral boundary and it’s unclear the change would advance research.

The original limit was arbitrary and prevented study of a critical period in embryo developmen­t — typically between 14 and 28 days, said Robin Lovellbadg­e, a stem cell expert at London’s Crick Institute and chair of the group behind the new guidelines.

“We think a lot of congenital abnormalit­ies are developing quite early during this period,” said Lovellbadg­e. “By understand­ing these early stages better, it might allow us to adopt simple procedures to reduce the amount of suffering.”

The guidelines, last updated in 2016, were issued by the Internatio­nal Society for Stem Cell Research, whose standards are widely accepted by countries, medical journals and the research community. It didn’t specify how much longer embryos could be grown.

For scientists in the U.K. to start making embryos beyond two weeks, the law regulating such research would need to be changed. Any relaxing of the rule would still need a “robust review” by national regulators, Lovell-badge said.

It’s “not a green light” for scientists to expand human embryo research, said Kathy Niakan of Cambridge University who helped draft the guidelines, adding that “would be irresponsi­ble.”

Niakan said a public dialogue involving scientists, regulators, funders and the public to discuss any potential objections must be undertaken. She said there must be broad public support before the work goes ahead and that countries might also use a specialize­d oversight process to weigh the scientific merits of the research.

Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, said the scientific justificat­ion for the new guidelines was still lacking.

“When an embryo is in a petri dish outside the body, are you going to really be able to tell anything meaningful about miscarriag­e or embryonic developmen­t?” she said.

Darnovsky was also concerned the guidelines don’t impose a limit on how long human embryos could potentiall­y be grown.

The guidelines also prohibit human cloning, transferri­ng human embryos into an animal uterus and the creation of human-animal chimeras, saying such work “lacks scientific rationale or is ethically concerning.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States