San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

THIS MOMENT REQUIRES ACTION, PROCESSING

- BY RACHEL LOCKE Locke is director of Impact:peace at the Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice, University of San Diego. She lives in South Park.

Enraged. Appalled. Not surprised. These are words we have all heard and perhaps uttered in reaction to the rapidly unfolding events in Afghanista­n. Many are enraged over a U.S. departure that will leave thousands — if not millions — in harm’s way as the Taliban resumes control. Many are appalled by what they see as a waste of two decades of American investment in Afghanista­n, totaling more than $2.2 trillion. Others assert, with a degree of resignatio­n, that what is taking place now was inevitable, so let’s just move along.

Having lived in conflict zones and studied violence and war for just about as long as the U.S. has been in Afghanista­n, I know one thing to be certain: There is never one thing. Wars, and the violence and trauma that accompany them, are exceedingl­y complex. “Good guys” can also be “bad guys,” and bad guys good. There are no “saviors.” People are complicate­d, and even those intending to do good often end up doing harm. For many Americans, the war in Afghanista­n has been boiled down to an erroneousl­y simple choice in regards to military presence: stay, or go. Our brains veer towards simplicity, even when the facts require complexity.

One implicatio­n of the speed with which the Taliban takeover has occurred is that our officials, and the wider American public, can barely process what we are seeing, let alone what we aren’t seeing. With nearly all news reports focused on Kabul and even more narrowly on the Kabul airport, most Americans have very little concept of what is confrontin­g the over 30 million Afghans living outside of the capital city.

To be sure, this moment requires emergency action, including evacuation­s and life-saving efforts. But it also requires processing. It requires asking the questions all too often left out of the simplistic “in or out” paradox, confrontin­g our responsibi­lities, the actions pursued in our names, and considerin­g our course of action moving forward.

On Monday, President Joe Biden said, “We went to Afghanista­n almost 20 years ago with clear

goals: Get those who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2001, and make sure al-qaeda could not use Afghanista­n as a base from which to attack us again.” To be clear, making sure something doesn’t happen is often just as hard as making sure it does. It requires control and influence. Biden’s statement includes an implicit goal not just of military defeat, but of power influence. Indeed, in the early days of the U.S. invasion, President George W. Bush made clear that a “friendly regime” in Kabul was necessary, and voiced intent to support “reconstruc­tion” by invoking the Marshall Plan.

In order for the American people to support the financial and human investment required to ensure a “friendly regime,” compelling narratives were shared, including calls for action in the face of massive human rights abuses by the Taliban. Americans were rightly appalled by the extreme harm inflicted not only on women and girls, but also on boys and men, minority groups and others by the Taliban.

While the cruelty of the Taliban is not disputed, the framing of the narrative created a story in the minds of most Americans that was at best simplistic, and at worst neo-colonial. While there was — and continues to be — altruistic intent behind much of the U.S. engagement in Afghanista­n, we cannot escape the fact that even this good intent was embedded in notions of power and influence that are fundamenta­lly U.s.-centric. Seeing a country — an entire constellat­ion of people, land, history, traditions — through a lens that is fundamenta­lly exogenous was always problemati­c.

America waged a war — perhaps the most consequent­ial action a president (or four) can take. We owe it to ourselves, to our troops, to all who served out of uniform, and to a country we occupied for 20 years to not look away. To challenge simplistic explanatio­ns, and to challenge our leaders to do better going forward. President Biden claimed that nation-building was never the goal in Afghanista­n. As scholars and policy makers, we can debate definition­s of nation-building; as Americans we must acknowledg­e that shaping and influencin­g an Afghanista­n that heeded our strategic wishes was always the goal, and was always doomed. Only if we reflect can we strive towards preventing it happening again.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States