San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

Democrats fear fallout from change in border policy

- MICHAEL SMOLENS Columnist

Some Democrats are increasing­ly worried about an immigratio­n onslaught — at the polls in November.

For the past year, Republican­s have made clear they see a winning strategy in again appealing to voters’ concerns about immigratio­n and border security. And that was before the Biden administra­tion decided to end the policy that allows U.S. officials to quickly turn away asylum seekers at the border because of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Immigratio­n officials acknowledg­e the change will result in an increase in migrants coming into the United States. Democratic critics contend there’s not a plan in place to deal with that — or the political repercussi­ons. Typical Biden allies in Congress have said now is not the time to shift away from the policy under the rule known as Title 42, which was invoked by former President Donald Trump.

In doing so, vulnerable Democrats almost sound like they’ve adopted Republican talking points. Polls reflect voter unhappines­s with how Biden has handled immigratio­n and border matters.

“We’ve got a crisis on the southern Arizona border,” said Sen. Mark Kelly, Dariz., according to Roll Call. “I talk about it because it’s an issue for my state and for my constituen­ts. And I also think it’s a national security issue.”

Others say the policy change is needed, but are wary of the price Democrats may pay for it.

“It’s the right thing to do, but I don’t know if it will be a political problem or not,” said House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., according to CNN.

That’s an age-old dilemma: asking people to back good policy (at least in the eyes of some) even if it seems bad politics.

Republican­s clearly see it as bad policy but, for them,

good politics.

Three states — Missouri, Arizona and Louisiana — filed a lawsuit aimed at blocking Biden from rescinding Title 42. The change is scheduled to take effect on May 23. Last week, a $10 billion COVID-19 relief package was delayed when Senate Republican­s attempted to tie it to a vote on Title 42.

Then some Democratic senators, including Kelly, joined Republican lawmakers in introducin­g a bill to temporaril­y block Biden’s plan.

“I think everybody is justifiabl­y freaked out about what’s going to happen at the border,” said Sen. John Thune, R-S.D. “... How are they going to manage that? ... I think it’s crazy. Crazy politicall­y, too.”

Some former Trump administra­tion officials have urged Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to declare a border “invasion” and direct state police and National Guard to turn back migrants — which would be a legally questionab­le move since immigratio­n is the purview of the federal government. As of Friday, Abbott was noncommitt­al on that, but he did order state troopers to stop and inspect commercial vehicles crossing the border.

Abbott said he plans to transport undocument­ed migrants to Washington — those who are willing and have been released from federal custody — further highlighti­ng his dispute with the Biden administra­tion over immigratio­n policy.

Some immigratio­n advocates say the “Armageddon” rhetoric is overblown and that there are ways to manage the situation better than before. The administra­tion is increasing border staffing and expanding facilities while lining up more transporta­tion. Plans are also in the works to increase COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns for migrants.

Biden kept Title 42 in place since taking office in January 2021, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on April 1 said it was no longer necessary “considerin­g current public health conditions and an increased availabili­ty of tools to fight COVID-19.”

Advocates and many Democrats contend Trump invoked Title 42 not so much for public health reasons but to sharply limit asylum for people f leeing persecutio­n in other nations. Public health experts and federal judges have questioned the need for the program. Since Trump’s action in March 2020, migrants have been expelled from the U.S. more than 1.7 million times.

Critics of the policy say asylum seekers have been endangered by Title 42 by being sent to areas where they are targets for attacks and kidnapping­s, including being returned to their home countries.

Migrants were not treated consistent­ly under the policy, according to Kate Morrissey of The San Diego Union-tribune, who reported that people of certain nationalit­ies have been processed in the U.S. while others have not. Recently, Morrissey noted U.S. officials had exempted Ukrainians who arrived at the San Diego-tijuana border, allowing them to enter the San Ysidro Port of Entry while turning away Mexican asylum seekers who said people were trying to kill them in Tijuana.

What kind of political impact the asylum change has may depend on whether it is seen as an orderly or chaotic process. Tens of thousands of migrants are camped along the border waiting to get in and more are expected to come.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas acknowledg­ed the anticipate­d inf lux of migrants, but said they will be dealt with appropriat­ely and fairly.

“What distinguis­hes us from the past is the fact that we will not implement policies of cruelty that disregard our asylum laws,” Mayorkas said on “CBS Evening News.” “We are rebuilding a system that was entirely dismantled.”

Democrats tend to support that, but even those far from the border are concerned.

“When I travel around my district I do hear from constituen­ts who are frustrated about the ongoing crisis and the challenges we face in our southern border,” said Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-VA., at a recent committee hearing. “And my constituen­ts are right to expect a secure border and right to expect a lawful immigratio­n system that works.”

Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on Twitter that “We can, and MUST, do both.”

A more accessible immigratio­n system and border security aren’t mutually exclusive, but they’re often framed as an either/or propositio­n. Calls continue — as they have for decades — for a sweeping overhaul that improves both the immigratio­n system and border security. As before, there is little prospect of that happening anytime soon.

Polls show Republican­s could retake majorities in both the House and Senate in the fall. For Democrats, there’s always the hope that the broad political landscape will look different by then and that the Biden administra­tion will show it has a reasonable handle on the immigratio­n system. But for now, they’re girding for blowback over the lifting of Title 42.

A Morning Consult/ Politico poll released Wednesday said 56 percent of all voters surveyed oppose removing the pandemic-era border policy.

The introducti­on to the poll called it “this administra­tion’s most unpopular decision so far.”

Tweet of the Week

Goes to Emily Alpert Reyes (@Alpertreye­s) of the Los Angeles Times.

“It’s beginning to feel like we should start getting news alerts when a politician does ‘not’ test positive for the coronaviru­s.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ANA RAMIREZ U-T ?? A group of asylum seekers and advocates in Tijuana walk to the San Ysidro Pedestrian East Port of Entry in protest of Title 42 on March 21.
ANA RAMIREZ U-T A group of asylum seekers and advocates in Tijuana walk to the San Ysidro Pedestrian East Port of Entry in protest of Title 42 on March 21.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States