San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

Risky alternativ­es

A new study found that even creditwort­hy homebuyers may be unable to find traditiona­l mortgages, but the arrangemen­ts often lack typical consumer protection­s

- BY ANN CARRNS

Millions of American home shoppers have taken on risky and generally more costly alternativ­e financing, in part because even creditwort­hy buyers may have trouble finding traditiona­l mortgages for lower-priced properties, new research suggests.

One in 15 current home borrowers, or about 7 million Americans, uses alternativ­e financing, including arrangemen­ts in which they make payments directly to the seller instead of to a lender, according to a recent survey by the Pew Charitable Trusts. The survey also found that the use of alternativ­e financing was highest among Hispanic borrowers and people with an annual income below $50,000.

The financing arrangemen­ts often lack consumer protection­s available with traditiona­l home loans and are lightly regulated by a patchwork of federal and state rules, said Tara Roche, manager of Pew’s home financing project. Adding to buyer confusion, the arrangemen­ts may have different names in different parts of the country.

The size of the alternativ­e financing market is murky because there is no systematic national collection of data about such purchases, Roche said. In many states, the agreements do not have to be recorded in a public registry, as convention­al mortgage purchases do.

When the home financing project conducted a national survey of about 5,000 adults in June, the number who said they had used alternativ­e financing was much higher than it had expected.

“We were very surprised to see that 36 million people have used alternativ­e financing, spread

out across the States,” Roche said.

Most Americans need mortgages to help pay for their homes. But in some cases, people — or the homes they want to buy — may not qualify for a convention­al mortgage. In other instances, some eligible borrowers may be pushed to alternativ­e financing because it is hard to find traditiona­l mortgages for amounts below $150,000, according to Pew. Lenders have little incentive to make small loans because larger loans are more profitable.

Pew found the most common type of alternativ­e financing to be personal property or “chattel” loans, which are often used to buy manufactur­ed homes (formerly called mobile homes). The loans are akin to traditiona­l mortgages but often carry much higher interest rates and shorter terms, resulting in higher monthly payments and more interest paid over the life of the loan when compared with manufactur­edhome borrowers who obtain mortgages. Because the loans are not considered traditiona­l mortgages, they are not subject to foreclosur­e

United rules, and lenders often can repossess the homes quickly if a borrower falls behind.

With chattel loans, the borrower typically buys the structure but rents the land beneath it. Landowners — increasing­ly, profession­al investors — can raise the rent to levels the borrower cannot afford, leading to a default.

In one common type of seller-financed agreement, called a “contract for deed” or a land contract, the seller extends credit directly to the buyer, who typically does not receive the deed to the property until the loan is paid. Because buyers lack proof of ownership, their payments may not build equity in the property, and it may not be clear who is responsibl­e for taxes and repairs. The loans typically lack foreclosur­e protection­s, so buyers who fall behind in payments may risk eviction and loss of their investment if they miss a payment.

“They come with very high risk,” said Mike Calhoun, president of the Center for Responsibl­e Lending. “They are almost always a horrible idea.”

Nontraditi­onal financing needs further scrutiny by policymake­rs, Calhoun said, particular­ly because buyers may be increasing­ly forced to consider it as housing becomes less affordable.

Home prices have surged because of a lack of available properties, and now mortgage rates are rising. The average interest rate on a 30year fixed-rate home loan reached 5 percent in midapril, the highest in more than a decade. Rising rates and prices combined with tight inventory “are making the pursuit of homeowners­hip the most expensive in a generation,” mortgage finance giant Freddie Mac said.

Manufactur­ed homes offer a large pool of unsubsidiz­ed affordable housing, but risky financing and challenges with land ownership can undermine their potential as a solution to the housing shortage, Roche said.

The industry needs “more careful oversight and regulation,” Calhoun said, if it is to be a viable “mainstream” alternativ­e.

Here are some questions and answers about alternativ­e home financing:

Can alternativ­e financing help people own homes?

Pew said more research was needed to quantify how often homebuyers succeeded in securing title to their homes when using nontraditi­onal financing. In a separate report, Pew said that “virtually nothing is known about the share of families that actually end up owning their homes when using these agreements.” But it also said available evidence “clearly indicates frequent poor outcomes.” A 2012 study that focused on low-income settlement­s in Texas, for instance, found that fewer than 20 percent of contractfo­r-deed buyers made the transition to a deed.

How can I protect myself when using alternativ­e financing?

If you are considerin­g buying with some sort of alternativ­e financing, always research other options, Calhoun said. Some buyers may feel intimidate­d by seeking financing at a traditiona­l lender, but it is best to start there, he said: “Check with your bank or credit union.”

Purchases that include both a manufactur­ed home and the land beneath it may be eligible for convention­al mortgages, Calhoun noted. “People need to comparison shop,” he said.

(More than one-quarter of personal-property loan borrowers own the land under their homes and could be eligible for mortgages, Pew’s report said, although they may have to jump through legal hoops in some states.)

Sarah Bolling Mancini, a lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center, said arrangemen­ts such as land contracts carried significan­t risks. One way borrowers can protect themselves, she said, is to file an affidavit or a copy of the financing contract, with a local registry of deeds or county clerk’s office to document their financial interest in the property. People can do this themselves or seek low-cost or free legal help. The federal government offers an online search tool.

What is the difference between a manufactur­ed home and a mobile home?

Although many people use the terms interchang­eably, manufactur­ed homes are factory-built houses made after mid-1976 that comply with constructi­on and safety standards set by the Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Mobile homes were built before 1976. The industry produces about 90,000 factorybui­lt homes a year, the Manufactur­ed Housing Institute, a trade group, says.

 ?? TILL LAUER THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
TILL LAUER THE NEW YORK TIMES
 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Manufactur­ed homes offer a large pool of unsubsidiz­ed affordable housing, but they have added risks.
GETTY IMAGES Manufactur­ed homes offer a large pool of unsubsidiz­ed affordable housing, but they have added risks.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States