San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

Reader draws conclusion­s from overheard children

- CAROLYN HAX Email Carolyn at tellmewash­post.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at 9 a.m. Pacific time each Friday at www.washington­post.com. © 2016 Washington Post Writers Group

Dear Carolyn: Not a question, but an observatio­n: At work, I spend about an hour with tour groups giving interactiv­e lessons on historic activities. The groups are typically parent-chaperoned kids in fourth or fifth grade. I often overhear the kids’ conversati­ons as they chat and the subject comes up often of parents who aren’t present in their lives to the degree they would like. Here’s a recent conversati­on:

Girl 1: (says something I didn’t hear).

Girl 2: “Yeah my Dad is always off somewhere on the phone working.”

Sure enough, I scanned our lesson area, and a man with our group was off to the side having a focused conversati­on on his phone. While I don’t know for sure, it seems likely the man was the subject of the girls’ chat. So, all that is to say, kids notice everything. Be present as much as possible.

Casual Observer

Answer: Not an answer, but an anecdote: One school vacation week, we took the boys on multiple day trips. City walks, trampoline park, mall with an Imax theater, children’s museum. The last day, exhausted, we had a movies-and-pajamas day.

For his writing assignment on how he spent his vacation, one of them wrote, “We watched TV.”

Your conclusion­s are unimpeacha­ble — attention is paramount, phones can be a massive attention-suck, kids notice everything. Yes, yes. But your evidence gives me the yips.

Please be careful whom you judge and why. Pre-phones, that dad may not have been able to leave the office at all to serve as chaperone, and the call you witnessed may have been what freed him up for the rest of the field trip.

Kids, like the adults they’re watching so closely, sometimes tell the truth, and sometimes tell only part of it to create a certain effect.

Dear Carolyn: I’m in a wonderful, solid relationsh­ip with my boyfriend and we’re planning to get married. I have an inner conflict that rears its ugly head when I’m socializin­g with my boyfriend’s workmates, who are extroverts like my boyfriend. They’re high energy, feed off each other’s energy and talk endlessly. I’m quieter and not “entertaini­ng.”

In the earlier days of our dating, he talked about his “work wife” (his words). She is the polar opposite of me. They’re still besties now.

I feel insecure that 1) he connects in a special way with his workmates that I don’t with him, 2) I fear I’m boring compared to them.

I’m reluctant to share this with him because it’s not my place to control his social life, and why should he change when he’s done nothing wrong?

How do I shift to a healthier mindset? Lean on my own friends and hobbies to take my mind off this?

Conflicted and Sad

Answer: Never marry an unsolved problem.

That’s Rule No. 1 for preventing relationsh­ip misery. Don’t proceed even one more step toward marriage until you’ve addressed your doubts.

Rule No. 2: Don’t rely solely on your own explanatio­ns for other people’s behavior when they are available to explain it themselves.

For all you know, the “work wife’s” extroversi­on is the reason he doesn’t love her romantical­ly. Why not just point out to him the obvious difference­s you’ve noticed in your temperamen­t and the temperamen­ts of his friends? And ask him if he’s noticed too? And whether he’s thought about why he chose an introvert as a partner? And whether that was deliberate in some way or purely coincident­al? And whether it ever bothers him that you’re more reserved, even if he prefers it?

Not as an interrogat­ion, just a conversati­on. It’s not about control or change, it’s just about your getting to know each other (much) better. And understand­ing your relationsh­ip. You chose him, after all, despite his “other”-ness; he could just as easily feel insecure because you connect with other introverts in a way he never can with you, and feels shallow compared to them. Which brings us to:

Rule No. 3: Don’t assign negative values to things that are merely different.

This applies even with ourselves. Have you thought about why you’ve applied the worst interpreta­tions to your own nature? “Not ‘entertaini­ng’ ”? “Boring”? Expressing concern is “control”?

Rule No. 4: Hold out for true intimacy — which means saying the things that scare you, not hiding out in your like-minded friends and your hobbies.

If you don’t feel safe enough to be vulnerable, then either you’re not ready for an intimate relationsh­ip or you’re not with the right partner. Or both. All of which are fine, as long as you’re honest with yourself about that and adjust your relationsh­ips accordingl­y.

You and your boyfriend have a lot of important things to talk about, and marriage isn’t one of them — yet. Own up, then see what you get.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States