San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

AIRLINE WITHDRAWS FROM BRITISH PLAN FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS

Charter company won’t take deported migrants to Rwanda

- BY EUAN WARD Ward writes for The New York Times.

A charter airline contracted by the British government to transport migrants to Rwanda has pulled out of the deal following outside pressure, another blow to Britain’s hard-line immigratio­n plan to send asylum seekers to the small African nation.

The British deal with Rwanda came as Western nations are taking tougher stands against accepting refugees, and as thousands of people have crossed the English Channel in small boats this year seeking asylum. Rwanda’s president, Paul Kagame, is aiming to position his country as a solution to the migrant crisis, though critics see the country as trying to benefit financiall­y from the arrangemen­t.

Under the deal, Britain would pay $135 million to Rwanda to finance opportunit­ies for the migrants, including education, job skills and language training. Those who are granted asylum would not be able to return to Britain, and would remain in Rwanda.

Privilege Style, the Spanish charter airline that pulled out of the arrangemen­t, operated a deportatio­n flight in June that became the center of a legal and media firestorm and was halted after the European Court of Human Rights intervened. It was the first and so far only attempted flight as part of Britain’s agreement with Rwanda.

In a letter that the charter airline sent to a British charity that opposes the flights, Privilege Style said it would “not operate flights to Rwanda in the future.” The letter, which was seen by The New York Times on Friday, added that the charter company had not flown to Rwanda “since the one flight scheduled for June 2022, which is the reason for this controvers­y, was suspended.”

The company’s withdrawal from the arrangemen­t was first reported by The Guardian on Friday. The company would not disclose to The Times how much its contract was worth.

A spokespers­on for Britain’s Home Office said it would “not comment on operationa­l matters” when asked how it now intended to transport asylum seekers to Rwanda and whether any other charter airlines were being contracted for the flights.

The company’s pullout could present a potentiall­y insurmount­able hurdle to a plan that has so far failed to send a single asylum seeker to Rwanda amid continuing legal battles. Charter airlines that have conducted deportatio­n flights in the past to other countries have already distanced themselves from the plan.

Boris Johnson, Britain’s former prime minister, previously said that “tens of thousands” of migrants would be sent to Rwanda.

Opponents of the policy praised the airline’s decision to scrap the flights.

“The pullout by Privilege Style is a cautionary tale for any other aviation company that even considers getting into bed with the British government on a scheme like this,” said Sonya Sceats, the chief executive of Freedom From Torture, a British charity that led the campaign to get the airline to withdraw from the effort. “Any company that wants to go down this route again now knows that it will come at an incredible cost to their brand.”

Liz Truss, who resigned as prime minister on Thursday, had remained steadfast throughout her six weeks in power regarding her support for the migrant plan. The current favorites to replace her — Rishi Sunak, Johnson and Penny Mordaunt — have taken similarly firm stances on immigratio­n issues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States