San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

He thought he could negotiate with Hitler

‘The Pope at War’ paints a bleak picture of Pius XII as a weak spiritual leader

- BY JOHN LOUGHERY

Of all the thorns in the side of the many apologists for Pope Pius XII, Brown University professor David I. Kertzer is probably the most formidable. Avoiding the strident tone of Garry Wills’s “Papal Sin” or John Cornwell’s aggressive­ly titled “Hitler’s Pope,” Kertzer’s books about the papacy are models of calm, uncluttere­d prose, prodigious research, and the ability to appeal to both a scholarly and a general audience. In his book “The Pope at War: The Secret History of Pius XII, Mussolini, and Hitler,” Kertzer brings all of his usual detective and narrative skills to bear. The story isn’t an inspiring one.

The reputation of Pius XII has not worn well since his death in 1958. His detractors see a pontiff indifferen­t to the suffering of the Jews at the hands of the Nazis and a weak spiritual leader intimidate­d by Adolf Hitler and manipulate­d by Benito Mussolini. Pius’ defenders say this view paints a radically distorted picture of a man who was caught between the need to protect his church, with its 40 million German Catholics, and the barbarism of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy.

By the mid-1960s, the Catholic Church could no longer ignore the clamor. Between 1965 and 1981, a 12-volume compilatio­n of the Holy See’s World War II documents was released by the Vatican. It has long been suspected, though,

“The Pope at War:

The Secret History of Pius XII, Mussolini, and Hitler”

by David I. Kertzer (Random House, 2022; 621 pages)

that evidence not flattering to Pius XII was held back. In 2019, Pope Francis decided it was time to admit outside historians to the archives. Kertzer, the author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning “The Pope and Mussolini: The Secret History of Pius XI and the Rise of Fascism in Europe” and “The Pope Who Would Be King: The Exile of Pius IX and the Emergence of Modern Europe,” was in Rome at the door of the archives on the day the relevant files were opened for study. The result is the most comprehens­ive account of the Vatican’s relations to the Nazi and fascist regimes before and during the war, the temporizin­g of the pope, and the opportunit­ies for moral courage that were lost.

It seems remarkable in retrospect that Pius XII ever thought he could come to terms with Hitler. Days after the pope’s coronation in 1939, the German dictator showed the world how much the Munich Pact meant to him when he invaded Czechoslov­akia and incorporat­ed it into the Reich. Yet Pius XII, hesitant and often out of touch with hard realities, believed he could negotiate with a man he perceived as a needed bulwark against communism. The fate of Europe’s Jews never entered into his thinking.

It is disturbing to read of the new pope’s decision to shelve the encyclical attacking racism and antisemiti­sm that his predecesso­r, Pius XI, had planned to release the day before his death, and of his warm birthday greetings to the Führer in April 1939, six months after the horror of Kristallna­cht. These and other sorry facts have long been known, though.

Truly shocking is Kertzer’s discovery in the archives of an account of a secret meeting between the pope and a representa­tive of the Reich, King Victor Emmanuel’s German son-in-law, only weeks before the invasion of Poland. The Vatican has carefully kept all mention of this meeting out of the official record, and only with the 2020 opening of those files has it come to light.

In that meeting, Pius XII agreed to avoid involvemen­t in what he called “partisan politics” in the Reich, which would have included the activities of the Gestapo, the Nazi euthanasia program and the reign of terror visited on the Jews, in return for an end to restrictio­ns on parochial-school education and attacks on his clergy.

Kertzer’s depiction of Vatican politics during the war is even more heartbreak­ing. Pius XII continued to believe that he could tame an inferno of hate if he remained committed to diplomatic overtures and placating language, and he declined to condemn the invasion of Catholic Belgium, the Netherland­s or France. Polish pleas for help went unanswered. He was outspoken about the Allied bombing of Rome, but about the roundup of Rome’s Jews in 1943, he said nothing. He refused to excommunic­ate Hitler, Heinrich Himmler or Mussolini, all nominal Catholics to the day they died. Though Pius XII talked of martyrdom on occasion, he had no intention of moving in that direction.

“The Pope at War” is more than an examinatio­n of one man’s failings, though. Among the book’s many satisfacti­ons is the wide net the author casts with ably drawn portraits of the German diplomats, Italian politician­s, ambassador­s and nuncios, cardinals and Vatican bureaucrat­s with whom the pope interacted. This is a chronicle with very few heroes.

Loughery wrote this for The Washington Post.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States