San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

COVID VACCINES TARGETING OMICRON SHOULD BE STANDARD, PANEL SAYS

FDA committee urges phasing out original formula

- BY BENJAMIN MUELLER & SHARON LAFRANIERE Mueller and Lafraniere write for The New York Times.

An expert committee advising the Food and Drug Administra­tion recommende­d Thursday that regulators phase out the original versions of the coronaviru­s vaccines, allowing Americans getting their first shots to receive the updated formulatio­ns now used as boosters.

As the advisers endorsed ending one era of the COVID vaccinatio­n campaign, they also grappled with its future. FDA scientists described a broad series of possible changes to the country’s vaccinatio­n program, all of them aimed at simplifyin­g what had become an elaborate set of inoculatio­n guidelines and at defending against wintertime hospital surges.

Among their proposals was adopting a streamline­d dosing schedule for all COVID vaccines, one that would apply to Americans based on their age and health risks. Under that proposal, most adults and children with previous vaccines could receive a single extra COVID shot each fall, while older adults, people with weakened immune systems and unvaccinat­ed children could be given more than one additional dose.

The expert advisers did not vote on that proposal. But they offered an outline for how they wanted federal health officials to consider making the COVID vaccinatio­n program more routine, pressing them on how to time boosters for greatest protection and formulate them to best defend against new variants.

Jerry Weir, the director of the division of viral products at the FDA, said, “We think that simplifica­tion of the vaccinatio­n regimen would contribute to easier vaccine deployment, better communicat­ion and improved vaccine coverage.”

Committee members overwhelmi­ngly endorsed that position, saying they hoped to reduce confusion caused by different versions of the vaccines and to boost vaccinatio­n rates.

“We can’t keep doing what we are doing,” said Dr. Bruce Gellin, chief of global public health strategy at the Rockefelle­r Foundation. “This is a good path forward.”

The pandemic’s threat has significan­tly abated since last winter. A vast majority of Americans have been infected with the virus, been vaccinated or both, federal experts said.

Yet an average of more than 560 Americans a day are still dying from COVID, the highest toll since late August, federal data shows. Many more are suffering the prolonged effects of infections. And Ruth Link-gelles, a public health researcher with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, warned Thursday that those who received the original vaccine formulatio­n many months ago had considerab­ly less protection against hospitaliz­ation for COVID than people with bivalent booster doses did.

Only about 40 percent of adults age 65 and older, and only 16 percent of people age 5 and older, have received the updated booster shot that was rolled out in September. Experts have said that the doses are most urgently needed by older adults, people with immune deficienci­es, pregnant women and those with multiple existing health conditions.

Some experts said Thursday that it was too soon to say whether annual doses were needed as they are for the flu.

“I think we need to see what happens with disease burden,” said Dr. Cody Meissner, the chief of pediatric infectious diseases at Tufts University School of Medicine. “We may or may not need annual vaccinatio­n.”

Several new studies in recent days have reported results that, while riddled with gaps in the data and other uncertaint­ies, the authors said reinforced the benefits of the updated bivalent booster shots. Those vaccines were designed to defend against both the original version of the virus and the BA.5 Omicron subvariant that spread across the United States in autumn.

One of them, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the bivalent boosters generated stronger protection than the original formulatio­ns of booster shots did.

The bivalent booster was about 62 percent effective against severe COVID, the study found, compared with the original booster, which was 25 percent effective. (The study examined the original booster during last summer and the updated booster during autumn.)

Another study, conducted by the CDC, suggested that the updated booster shot performed as well against the newest Omicron subvariant, XBB.1.5, as it did against the earlier version of Omicron, BA.5. For adults younger than 50, a bivalent booster was 48 percent effective against COVID infections caused by XBB.1.5, the CDC found, and 52 percent effective against infections caused by BA.5.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States