San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

FAMILY LEAVE STILL OUT OF REACH FOR ALMOST HALF OF U.S. WORKERS

- BY KELSEY BUTLER

Three decades after the U.S. adopted a policy that let people keep their jobs while taking time off for an illness or new baby, almost half of U.S. workers aren’t eligible, and advocates in individual states are still struggling to make sure that those who do take leave can also get paid.

In the next two years, paid leave programs will start paying out claims in Oregon, Colorado, Maryland and Delaware, home to some 9 million workers. Such policies already exist in nine other states plus Washington, D.C., and are part of a growing movement of states trying to fill the gap as nationwide action stalls.

“There is broad bipartisan support across all constituen­cies for paid family and medical leave,” said Jocelyn Frye, president of the National Partnershi­p for & Families. “The only place where we encounter opposition is in Congress, and part of that opposition has to do with whether we are willing to invest in care.”

On Feb. 5, 1993, President Bill Clinton signed the Family and Medical Leave Act into law. It had taken nine years to get FMLA passed, with the bill blocked every year since it was originally offered in 1984.

Today, the law is little changed from its original form: It allows some Americans to take up to 12 weeks of leave if they have a baby, get sick or need to care for an ill relative. It doesn’t guarantee pay, or apply to those who work for small businesses (fewer than 50 employees within 75 miles) or themselves. About 44 percent of U.S. employees — including those who work part time or have been in their role less than a year — are ineligible.

Jon Gromek, 37, still thinks about the time off he took when his youngest son was born three years ago.

The Ohio dad of two had just started a new nonprofit job after being laid off. He hadn’t hit the 12 months of service required before employers have to offer FMLA, or the six-month threshold at his new company for paid time off. But even if he had qualified for the unpaid leave, his family couldn’t afford it.

“I was able to negotiate one special day to be present for the birth of my son, on a Friday,” Gromek said. “The following Monday I went back to work.”

The U.S. is an outlier globally for its lack of paid time off for new parents or illness. It’s one of just seven countries that doesn’t guarwomen

any paid maternity leave. Only about one in four private sector workers has access to paid family leave. The absence of national work-family policies for parental, temporary disability and caregiving leave cost Americans $22.6 billion in lost wages annually in the decade through 2018, according to data from the Center for American Progress, a progressiv­e think tank.

One study by Moody’s Investors Service, a global credit ratings and research organizati­on, found that additional policies could boost U.S. economic output by almost $1 trillion in the next decade by making it easier for women to participat­e in the labor force.

Some conservati­ves say a federal paid leave program would cost taxpayers too much, place a burden on small businesses and open the door to fraudulent claims. There are also diverging opinions on how it should be funded: Democrats usually propose taxfunded plans, while recent Republican proposals call for tax credits or borrowing from Social Security funds.

Opposition to paid leave in President Joe Biden’s social spending plan from Sen. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, ultimately killed it. Manchin said that a paid leave policy should be done “in regular order” and not through budget reconcilia­tion, a process that can speed certain measures through Congress with a simple majority vote.

More than a decade after FMLA was passed, California was first to put in place a statewide initiative to try to subsidize federal policy. Workers in the most populous U.S. state began collecting on claims in 2004.

Since then, companies in the state with 25 or fewer workers saw a 14 percent drop in labor costs per employee when their staff used the program. Researcher­s found that women who had babies or whose spouses got sick were less likely to leave their jobs. And more men took advantage of paternity leave: In 2004, male claimants made up only 17 percent of all claims, but by 2020 that share was 40 percent.

Other states are trying to follow suit.

In New Mexico, a task force recommende­d the state put in place a program that would pay workers up to 12 weeks. Maine lawmakers are putting together a similar proposal. In a December address, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem called paid leave one of her administra­tion’s priorities. Michigan and Minnesota are two other states where similar efforts could take shape, said A’shanti F. Gholar, president of Emerge America, which recruits and trains Democratic women to run for office.

“This is a health care issue, an economic issue and an equality issue,” Gholar said.

But state plans, like exantee isting federal benefits, leave people out. Pay and wealth gaps also mean that women of color are less likely to be able to afford to take unpaid time off. Every year, about 1.1 million leaves needed by Black female workers aren’t taken.

In 2018, Sadé Dozan, 33, was working at a nonprofit too small to have to comply with New York’s paid leave regulation­s, which came into effect that year.

When her daughter was born in May, she used a mixture of vacation time and unpaid leave to take about three months to recover from an emergency C-section.

Six months later, her mother had a heart attack, but Dozan didn’t have any more time off.

“I have my daughter, I have two parents, I could need three sets of paid leave in a year,” said Dozan, who is now chief of operations and developmen­t at Caring Across Generation­s, which advocates for family caregivers. “What’s really telling about that story is it isn’t that uncommon.”

On a national level, there has been little progress in the 30 years since FMLA was passed. A proposal in Biden’s Build Back Better plan, which would have guaranteed at least some paid time off, came as close as it ever has before it was dropped. It would have provided four weeks of paid leave for new parents, sick and caregiving U.S. workers, and extended protection­s to gig and contract workers.

Some lawmakers want to try again.

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, a Pennsylvan­ia Democrat, and Rep. Stephanie Bice, an Oklahoma Republican, are leading a bipartisan working group with the aim of getting a national policy in place. The group will convene for the first time on Tuesday. Separately, a Congressio­nal Dads Caucus launched in January with paid leave listed as one of its priorities. In an event marking FMLA’S 30th anniversar­y last week, Biden said he’d keep pushing for a national paid family and medical leave program.

“It’s a tragedy that we’re so behind on this, but our goal is more leave for more people and that’s something we are committed to,” Houlahan said.

 ?? GREG GIBSON AP ?? President Bill Clinton signed the Family and Medical Leave Act into law in 1993, allowing time off for workers in states such as California.
GREG GIBSON AP President Bill Clinton signed the Family and Medical Leave Act into law in 1993, allowing time off for workers in states such as California.
 ?? MARIAM ZUHAIB AP ?? Opposition to paid leave in President Joe Biden’s social spending plan from Sen. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, ultimately killed expansion of the policy.
MARIAM ZUHAIB AP Opposition to paid leave in President Joe Biden’s social spending plan from Sen. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, ultimately killed expansion of the policy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States