San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

CAN THE LEGAL CANNABIS INDUSTRY BE SAVED?

-

California voters’ 2016 decision to legalize the recreation­al use of cannabis was mostly driven by the idea that whether or not to use the drug should be a choice left up to adults — not be dictated by laws written in an era in which “reefer madness” was seen as a societal scourge. But it was also sold in part as a smart way to create a large new revenue stream for local and state government­s. While Gavin Newsom, then lieutenant governor and now governor, made this argument as one of the leading voices for the Propositio­n 64 campaign, he also offered some notes of caution. In a May 2018 interview with The San Diego Union-tribune Editorial Board, he said he expected it would take “five to seven years to substantiv­ely address the black market.”

He’s running out of time on that prediction. Five years later, California isn’t anywhere close to the progress Newsom imagined. The latest evidence came last week with the report that revenue from the city of San Diego’s cannabis tax was plunging, mostly because the city’s two dozen authorized legal dispensari­es are being undercut by illegal delivery services whose unregulate­d, untaxed products are much cheaper and which have proliferat­ed because of comparativ­ely tiny start-up costs. The city now forecasts revenue of $19.8 million for the budget year that ends June 30, far less than the $25.7 million it previously expected. Broader struggles of the legal cannabis industry have led the Legislatur­e to eliminate some cultivatio­n taxes — and San Diego County supervisor­s to set low tax rates on the five authorized cannabis stores in unincorpor­ated areas. Assemblyme­mber Matt Haney, D-san Francisco, also wants to help the industry by legalizing the sale of food and nonalcohol­ic beverages at cannabis retailers and lounges.

It’s a tall order. As long as illegal cannabis products cost half as much as legal ones — as documented last year by UC Davis economists Robin Goldstein and Daniel Sumner — they will dominate sales. Voters’ 1996 approval of a law allowing legal “medicinal” cannabis — with buyers essentiall­y self-attesting to why their health issues required its use — set up a multibilli­on-dollar industry that often skirted state laws. A prescient 2018 analysis by the Southern California News Group noted that the industry was only emboldened by the fact that Propositio­n 64 reduced the penalties for most cannabis crimes and eliminated others entirely.

Legal shops in California clearly need a more level playing field to thrive. Given that most illegal sellers advertise their services, authoritie­s have a blueprint for an effective crackdown. But the longer that doesn’t really materializ­e statewide, the less likely lawmakers who aren’t enamored of a law-and-order agenda will be to pursue it. California will never “substantia­lly address” the black market as a result.

Five years ago, Newsom said he felt “a deep sense of responsibi­lity” to make sure Propositio­n 64 worked well. It’s time for him to demonstrat­e that.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States