San Diego Union-Tribune

CONGRESS SENDS $741B DEFENSE BILL TO PRESIDENT

Trump threatened to veto the measure before it was passed

- BY CATIE EDMONDSON Edmondson writes for The New York Times.

The Senate overwhelmi­ngly passed a sweeping military policy bill Friday that would require that Confederat­e names be stripped from U.S. military bases, clearing the measure for enactment and sending it to President Donald Trump’s desk in defiance of his threats of a veto.

The 84-13 vote to approve the legislatio­n ref lected broad bipartisan support for the measure that authorizes pay for U.S. troops and was intended to signal to Trump that lawmakers, including many Republican­s, were determined to pass the critical bill even if it meant potentiall­y delivering the first veto override of his presidency.

The margin surpassed the two-thirds majority needed in both houses to force enactment of the $741 billion bill over Trump’s objections. The House also met that threshold in passing the measure Tuesday, raising the prospect of a potential veto showdown during Trump’s final weeks in office.

The scene that played out on the Senate f loor Friday underscore­d how Republican­s, who have been reluctant to challenge the president on any other issue during his four years in office, have been extraordin­arily willing to break with Trump over one of the party’s key orthodoxie­s — projecting military strength.

“I encourage all of us to do what we have to do to get this bill done,” Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, told his colleagues in a speech from the f loor. “There’s no one more deserving in America than our troops that are out there in harm’s way, and we’re going to make sure we do the right thing for them.”

Thirteen senators, split evenly among party lines, voted against the bill, with Republican­s supporting Trump’s objections and Democrats chafing at the bill’s topline number. Three senators — Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Mike Rounds, R-S.D.; and Kamala Harris, D-Calif. — the vice president-elect, did not vote.

Congress has succeeded in passing the military bill each year for 60 years. But Trump has threatened to upend that tradition, pledging since the summer to veto the legislatio­n even as leaders in his own party privately implored him to support it.

Trump first objected to a provision supported overwhelmi­ngly by lawmakers in both parties in both chambers that would strip the names of Confederat­e leaders from military bases. In recent weeks, his attention shifted, and he demanded that the bill include an unrelated repeal of a legal shield for social media companies.

That demand, registered late in the legislativ­e process, found little support among lawmakers in either party, who regard shoehornin­g a major unrelated policy move into defense bill as untenable. They have hoped that strong votes in both chambers would cow Trump into retreating from his veto threat. But the president has given no indication to date that he will do so.

Included in the legislatio­n are a number of noncontrov­ersial, bipartisan measures, including new benefits for tens of thousands of Vietnam-era veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange, a 3 percent increase in pay for service members and a boost in hazardous duty incentive pay.

It would also take steps to slow or block Trump’s planned drawdown of U.S. troops from Germany and Afghanista­n, and would make it more difficult for the president to deploy military personnel to the southern border.

The legislatio­n also directly addresses the protests for racial justice spurred over the summer by the killing of Black Americans, including George Floyd, at the hands of the police. It would require all federal officers enforcing crowd control at protests and demonstrat­ions to identify themselves and their agencies. And it contains the bipartisan measure that directs the Pentagon to begin the process of renaming military bases named after Confederat­e leaders, a provision that Democrats fought to keep in the bill.

If Trump were to follow through with his threatened veto, the House would be the first to try at an override.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States