San Diego Union-Tribune

CALIFORNIA LOOSENS RULES FOR VACCINATED EMPLOYEES

Inoculated workers can forgo masks in most indoor settings

- BY LUKE MONEY

California’s circuitous journey to relaxing coronaviru­s-related workplace safety rules finally reached its destinatio­n Thursday, when the state moved to end physical-distancing requiremen­ts for all workers and allow most fully vaccinated employees in many workplaces to stop wearing masks.

The 5-1 decision from the Occupation­al Safety and Health Standards Board followed more than two hours of public comment, during which a number of business groups urged board members to go even further and eliminate any additional pandemic-related restrictio­ns on workplaces, while labor representa­tives said it’s still too early to pull back on the protective measures that have longed guided the state’s COVID-19 response.

“While I understand the proposal in front of us today is extremely controvers­ial and inconvenie­nt, now I don’t think is the time to let our guard down,” board

member David Harrison said. “We need to do everything reasonable, and I highlight reasonable ... within our power to protect employees in California.”

Normally, it would take at least 10 days for any boardadvan­ced standards to go into effect, as they are subject to review by the state Office of Administra­tive Law. But Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order almost immediatel­y after the decision to allow the revisions to take effect without the typical waiting period.

Workplaces still will be required to provide masks to workers who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and make sure they wear them while indoors or in shared workplace vehicles or employer-provided transporta­tion. Employers also will have to provide respirator­s — such as N95 masks — if an employee who is not yet fully vaccinated requests one.

Unvaccinat­ed workers generally will be able to take off their masks indoors only if they’re alone or eating or drinking.

The approved standards also do away with the requiremen­t for solid, cleanable partitions designed to reduce viral transmissi­on, such as the plastic barriers that separate customers and cashiers.

The revision “aligns with state guidelines, it addresses a number of stakeholde­r concerns about burdensome­ness while still providing robust protection to employees,” Eric Berg, deputy chief of the California Division of Occupation­al Safety and Health, or Cal/OSHA, said at Thursday’s meeting.

Employers have to document the vaccinatio­n status of employees if they are going to go without face coverings indoors, he added, but they don’t have to retain copies of vaccine cards, and employees can also self-attest as to their inoculatio­n status.

The lone board vote against the concept was member Laura Stock, who said she was concerned it “goes too far in rolling back essential protection­s while the pandemic is still going on.”

She took particular issue with the idea of employees attesting to their vaccinatio­n status.

“We are now putting most of our eggs in a basket around vaccines, and if vaccines (are) our primary strategy here, it is critical to ensure and verify who is vaccinated and who isn’t,” she said.

The new standards, which apply to most workplaces, are notably less restrictiv­e than a previous set the board voted on — which was rejected, advanced, then ultimately rescinded before taking effect.

Under those earlier rules, fully vaccinated people would still have been required to wear masks in an indoor workplace if even just one person who was unvaccinat­ed or whose vaccinatio­n status was unknown entered the room.

Starting Tuesday, coronaviru­s-related capacity restrictio­ns and physicaldi­stancing requiremen­ts were lifted for the general public at almost all businesses and other institutio­ns. Residents who are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 can now go without face masks in most nonwork situations.

Unvaccinat­ed individual­s, however, are still required to mask up in public indoor settings. And everyone, regardless of inoculatio­n status, has to wear a face covering while in transit hubs or while taking public transporta­tion; in health care settings and long-term care facilities; indoors at K-12 schools, in child-care facilities or other youth settings; in homeless shelters, emergency shelters and cooling centers; and in correction­al facilities and detention centers.

The specter of California’s reopening hung over the board’s previous deliberati­ons on what additional rules, if any, to keep in place for work sites. Many individual­s and business groups said that any workplace standards should dovetail with wider state regulation­s, as it no longer made sense to impose more restrictio­ns on a “fully” reopened economy.

However, some at Thursday’s meeting said that even relaxed masking rules were a nonstarter — one that would foment hostility toward those who are unvaccinat­ed and effectivel­y force people to wear a “scarlet letter” advertisin­g their private medical decisions.

Others went so far as to decry any face-covering requiremen­t as tantamount to discrimina­tion or segregatio­n and said the rules made no meaningful accommodat­ion for those who had not been vaccinated but had natural immunity from a previous coronaviru­s infection.

Business representa­tives also said any requiremen­t to provide N95 masks would be unduly onerous and objected to the idea that they should be required to confirm their employees’ vaccinatio­n status or enforce the rules that come with that determinat­ion.

“We trust our employees every day, including not coming to work with COVID-19 symptoms,” said Helen Cleary, director of the Phylmar Regulatory Roundtable, a business coalition. “We need to respect decisions not to get vaccinated, trust that people understand the risk and acknowledg­e natural immunity.”

Some workers and representa­tives from labor groups, on the other hand, warned that the danger posed by COVID-19 has not yet passed, and that rules that might make sense for the public at large can’t simply be applied wholesale to work sites, where employees often cluster in close quarters for extended periods of time.

Mitch Steiger, senior legislativ­e advocate for the California Labor Federation, said largely removing the mask mandate was essentiall­y pretending “that the pandemic is over” at a time when many California­ns have yet to be fully vaccinated and worrisome coronaviru­s variants are circulatin­g. “There’s really no way to escape the fact that so drasticall­y weakening the facecoveri­ng requiremen­ts in the standard ... will sicken many and likely kill some workers, particular­ly in rural areas, and especially among underserve­d communitie­s that are more likely to remain unvaccinat­ed,” he said.

During an event in Bakersfiel­d on Wednesday, Newsom noted that concerns remained “around self-attestatio­n and record-keeping related to employers with employees that are not vaccinated,” as well as the supply of N95 masks.

Newsom promised the state would provide a onemonth supply of the masks after business groups complained they would have to stockpile the N95s in competitio­n with health care workers.

There were 700 California workplace outbreaks and more than 10,000 infections in the last 30 days, Cal/ OSHA’s Berg said, but he said the N95s are the best alternativ­e as other protection­s wane.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States