SUPREME COURT LIMITS HUMAN RIGHTS SUITS
African men claimed two U.S. companies aided child slavery
The Supreme Court on Thursday said U.S. chocolate companies cannot be sued for child slavery on the African farms from which they buy most of their cocoa.
But the court stopped short of saying such a lawsuit could never go forward.
The court’s splintered decision was written by Justice Clarence Thomas. Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the decision, saying it was premature to dismiss the suit.
Six African men were seeking damages from Nestlé USA and Cargill, alleging that as children they were trafficked out of Mali, forced to work long hours on Ivorian cocoa farms and kept at night in locked shacks.
Their attorneys argue the companies should have better monitored their cocoa suppliers in West Africa, where about two-thirds of the world’s cocoa is grown and child labor is widespread.
At issue was whether the Malians have the right to sue the companies in U.S. courts and, more broadly, under what circumstances foreigners may sue U.S. firms for wrongs committed in their supply chains overseas.
The plaintiffs sued under the Alien Tort Statute, a 1789 law that allows federal district courts to hear “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.”
The law was largely dormant until the 1980s, when attorneys began to use it to pursue international human rights cases. The Supreme Court in 2004 said some claims might be allowed under the law, but since then has narrowed the scope rather than expanding it.
The court had previously rejected such lawsuits when the alleged misconduct occurred almost entirely abroad, and in the Malians’ case, the location of the alleged wrongs emerged as a critical point of dispute.
In the view of the companies, such cases ought to be filed not against the corporations but against the traffickers and farmers involved in Africa.
Attorneys for the Malians, meanwhile, argued that the mistreatment of the Malians stems from decisions by company officials in the United States — and therefore, U.S. courts should handle the matter. While Nestlé and other chocolate companies do not generally own the farms from which they obtain cocoa, the firms often provide training and other support to them.
“We believe they controlled the system of child forced labor in the Ivory Coast from the United States,” said Paul Hoffman, an attorney for the Malians.
In its decision Thursday, the Supreme Court sided with the companies on that critical issue.
“Nearly all the conduct that they say aided and abetted forced labor — providing training, fertilizer, tools, and cash to overseas farms — occurred in Ivory Coast,” Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.
The proliferation of global supply chains in recent decades has led to recurring debates over the responsibility of multinational companies to monitor the adherence of their far-flung suppliers to standards on human rights and the environment.
Business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, have pushed back against lawsuits such as the one against Nestlé and Cargill, arguing they are burdensome and could discourage investment in developing economies.