Civil discourse leads to better governance
“You’re a vaccination murderer.” This was one of many personal attacks aimed recently at San Diego County supervisors as they discussed COVID-19 pandemic concerns. Incidents of public behavior marked by aggressive and threatening speech have become so common that the U-T is dedicating this space to reader comments on how to address the vexing problem of not suppressing speech while also creating an environment for effective governing. The League of Women Voters believes the key to effective public participation and governing lies in an understanding of and a respect for civil discourse, the linchpin of any healthy democracy.
For 100 years, the League of Women Voters has fostered public participation in civic matters. Indeed, the League’s vision is a democracy in which everyone has the desire, the right, the knowledge and the confidence to participate in public life. We celebrate the surge of people attending meetings, yet lament the uncivil discourse occurring with alarming frequency and intensity.
The Board of Supervisors and other local jurisdictions have policies in place for public participation. We support regular review of those policies to ensure public officials can govern safely and effectively. However, more can be done. We believe that a lack of understanding of civil discourse and its importance has contributed to the escalating vitriol. Governing bodies, in partnership with all sectors of the community, can initiate education and outreach efforts on civil discourse, explaining its benefits, the obstacles to maintaining it and its importance in effective governance. Agencies could distribute a “Guide to Civil Discourse” at public meetings and on agency websites. Speakers at public meetings might be asked to acknowledge the code of conduct and the expectation of civility.
Studies that show that, when observed, civil discourse promotes informed discussion essential for good decision-making. People are more likely to feel empowered and accept decisions as fairer and more legitimate when they are the product of civil discourse. In contrast, uncivil discourse, especially hate speech directed at elected officials, often seems intended to intimidate rather than to inform or persuade. A lack of civil discourse leads to a lack of trust and impairs the effective functioning of our civic institutions, causing gridlock and polarization.
To be sure, the League of Women Voters understands that passion and politics often go together. We recognize the role of civil disobedience in advancing just causes, and we have fiercely protected people’s right to get into “good trouble.” We understand that speech is protected even when it is rude, hateful or offensive. But citizens, elected officials and staff should feel respected and safe when conducting the people’s business. We know that when we engage in civil discourse — when we are respectful, courteous, honest and open-minded — especially in the face of controversial issues, we are better for it, our institutions are better for it, and our nation is better for it.
Karen Sutton, president, League of Women Voters of North County San Diego and Kim Knox, president, League of Women Voters of San Diego.