San Diego Union-Tribune

COURT OKS RELEASE OF TRUMP WHITE HOUSE RECORDS

Justices reject his request to shield Jan. 6 documents

- BY DAVID G. SAVAGE Savage writes for the Los Angeles Times.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down former President Donald Trump’s plea to shield his White House records from the House committee investigat­ing the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

With one dissent, the justices agreed with two lower courts that decided the former president’s claim of executive privilege could not outweigh the views of President Joe Biden, who supported the release.

Only Justice Clarence Thomas voted to grant Trump’s appeal.

The documents at issue are held by the National Archives under the terms of the Presidenti­al Records Act.

In a brief unsigned opinion, the court said it appeared Trump’s bid to block the release of the records “would have failed even if he were the incumbent,” and as such, “his status as a former president necessaril­y made no difference to the (D.C. circuit) court’s decision.”

For this reason, the high court said, its decision rejecting Trump’s plea sets no precedent regarding expresiden­ts and their claims of executive privilege.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, a former White House lawyer for President George W. Bush, said he believed expresiden­ts retained the right to claim executive privilege.

“A former president must be able to successful­ly invoke the presidenti­al communicat­ions privilege for communicat­ions that occurred during his presidency, even if the current president does not support the privilege claim. Concluding otherwise would eviscerate the executive privilege for presidenti­al communicat­ions,” he wrote.

But he agreed with the outcome nonetheles­s.

Trump’s two other appointees — Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett — said nothing to indicate they disagreed with the ruling.

It’s not clear whether the archives have records that will prove significan­t for the House committee.

In August, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House committee, asked the archivist for “all documents and communicat­ions related to efforts, plans or proposals to contest the 2020 presidenti­al elections results.”

He also asked for “videos, photograph­s and other media” from the White House that related to the Jan. 6 rally, “the march to the Capitol and the activities of President Trump and other highlevel executive branch officials that day.”

Both Trump and Biden were notified of the request, and Biden replied it was “not in the best interests of the United States” for him to assert executive privilege given the “unique and extraordin­ary circumstan­ces.”

In October, lawyers for Trump filed suit seeking to block the release. They said the records were protected by presidenti­al privilege and Congress had no “legitimate legislativ­e purpose” in obtaining them.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, refused Trump’s request. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States