San Diego Union-Tribune

FALL IN CALIF. POPULATION DRIVEN BY COASTAL LOSSES

Growth still strong in inland parts of state, new data indicates

- BY SARAH PARVINI Parvini writes for the Los Angeles Times.

California’s population continued to decline after falling for the first time on record during the COVID-19 pandemic — but that loss is showing signs of slowing, new demographi­c data indicates.

The state’s population declined by 117,552 between Jan. 1, 2021, and Jan. 1, 2022, bringing the estimated total population to 39,185,605, according to data released by the state Department of Finance on Monday. The 0.3 percent decline represents a slowing compared with the 0.59 percent drop over the nine-month period between the April 2020 census date and that year’s end, demographe­rs said.

The dip underscore­s shifting immigratio­n patterns, declining birthrates and the large number of deaths due to the pandemic. A growing number of families have moved inland over the last few years, data show, but the migratory shift grew even more pronounced as the barriers to moving dropped for many in large cities, spurred by a newfound ability to work remotely.

California’s most populous counties saw sizable declines in population during the first year of the pandemic, census data show, highlighti­ng how the state’s housing crisis and other demographi­c forces are reshaping two of its largest cities.

Demographe­rs noted the first population decline ever recorded in the state last year, highlighti­ng larger trends that recently led to the loss of a congressio­nal seat. But there is no evidence of a “CalExodus,” said Walter Schwarm, chief demographe­r with the Department of Finance.

“To a certain extent, we have two or three things happening here — the pandemic is there in the sense that natural increase, it really slowed down over these two years. Some of that is a lack of births because of delayed childbeari­ng decisions,” Schwarm said.

COVID-19-related deaths, federal policies restrictin­g immigratio­n and an increase in domestic out-migration also affected population totals, the Department of Finance said.

“Overall growth was also affected by continuing federal delays in processing foreign migration: while last year saw positive immigratio­n (43,300), the level was below the average annual rate of 140,000 before the pandemic,” the department said in a statement.

Population growth remained strong in the interior counties of the Central Valley and the Inland Empire as California­ns in search of more open space, a sense of community and affordable housing continued to trade city life in major urban centers like the Bay Area or Los Angeles for suburban and rural communitie­s.

The shift inland, Schwarm said, also reflects an uptick in people who work for companies that offer remote or hybrid work.

“They’re willing to do a longer commute once or twice a month, or week, to have something different in an off-the-coast community where things are less dense and housing types are different,” he said.

The majority of counties in the state saw declines, data show, including every coastal county except San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Santa Cruz. That limited coastal growth is due in part to college students returning to campus, demographe­rs said.

Only two counties showed more than 1 percent growth: Yolo, due to increases in college group quarters including dorms, and San Benito, because of housing gains. At the same time, 34 of the state’s 58 counties lost population. The biggest drops occurred in Plumas, Lassen, Butte, Del Norte, Napa, San Mateo, Marin, Shasta, San Francisco and Ventura.

California’s three most populous counties all experience­d population loss: Los Angeles lost 70,114 people, San Diego lost 1,197 and Orange lost 7,297. Of the 10 largest cities in California, Bakersfiel­d had the largest percentage gain in population at 0.7 percent, followed by San Diego at 0.2 percent.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States