San Diego Union-Tribune

JUDGE: GREENE QUALIFIES TO RUN FOR RE-ELECTION

Ga. elections chief accepts ruling to allow her on ballot

- BY KATE BRUMBACK Brumback writes for The Associated Press.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensper­ger accepted a judge’s findings Friday and said U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is qualified to run for re-election despite claims by a group of voters that she had engaged in insurrecti­on.

Georgia Administra­tive Law Judge Charles Beaudrot issued a decision hours earlier that Greene was eligible to run, finding the voters hadn’t produced sufficient evidence to back their claims. After Raffensper­ger adopted the judge’s decision, the group that filed the complaint on behalf of the voters vowed to appeal.

Before reaching his decision, Beaudrot had held a daylong hearing in April that included arguments from lawyers for the voters and for Greene, as well as extensive questionin­g of Greene herself. He also received additional filings from both sides.

Raffensper­ger is being challenged by a candidate backed by former President Donald Trump in the state’s May 24 GOP primary after he refused to bend to pressure from Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia. Raffensper­ger could have faced huge blowback from right-wing voters if he had disagreed with Beaudrot’s findings.

Raffensper­ger wrote in his “final decision” that typical challenges to a candidate’s eligibilit­y have to do with questions about residency or

whether they have paid their taxes. Such challenges are allowed under a procedure outlined in Georgia law.

“In this case, Challenger­s assert that Representa­tive Greene’s political statements and actions disqualify her from office,” Raffensper­ger’s decision said. “That is rightfully a question for the voters of Georgia’s 14th Congressio­nal District.”

The challenge was filed for five voters in her district by Free Speech for People, a national election and campaign finance reform group. They allege the GOP congresswo­man played a significan­t

role in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot that disrupted Congress’ certificat­ion of Biden’s presidenti­al victory. They had argued that that put her in violation of a seldom-invoked part of the 14th Amendment having to do with insurrecti­on and makes her ineligible to run for re-election.

Greene applauded Beaudrot’s decision and called the challenge to her eligibilit­y an “unpreceden­ted attack on free speech, on our elections, and on you, the voter.”

“But the battle is only beginning,” she said in a statement. “The left will never stop their war to take away

our freedoms.” She added, “This ruling gives me hope that we can win and save our country.”

Free Speech for People had sent a letter to Raffensper­ger on Friday urging him to reject the judge’s recommenda­tion. They have 10 days to make their planned appeal of his decision in Fulton County Superior Court.

The group said in a statement that Beaudrot’s decision “betrays the fundamenta­l purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Insurrecti­onist Disqualifi­cation Clause and gives a pass to political violence as a tool for disrupting

and overturnin­g free and fair elections.”

During the April 22 hearing, Ron Fein, a lawyer for the voters, noted that in a TV interview the day before the attack at the U.S. Capitol, Greene said the next day would be “our 1776 moment.” Lawyers for the voters said some supporters of thenPresid­ent Trump used that reference to the American Revolution as a call to violence.

Greene is a conservati­ve firebrand and Trump ally who has become one of the GOP’s biggest fundraiser­s in Congress by stirring controvers­y and pushing baseless conspiracy theories. During the recent hearing, she repeated the unfounded claim that widespread fraud led to Trump’s loss in the 2020 election, said she didn’t recall various incendiary statements and social media posts attributed to her. She denied ever supporting violence.

Greene acknowledg­ed encouragin­g a rally to support Trump, but she said she wasn’t aware of plans to storm the Capitol or disrupt the electoral count using violence. Greene said she feared for her safety during the riot and used social media posts to encourage people to be safe and stay calm.

The challenge to her eligibilit­y was based on a section of the 14th Amendment that says no one can serve in Congress “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress to support the Constituti­on of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrecti­on or rebellion against the same.” Ratified shortly after the Civil War, it was meant in part to keep representa­tives who had fought for the Confederac­y from returning to Congress.

Greene “urged, encouraged and helped facilitate violent resistance to our own government, our democracy and our Constituti­on,” Fein said, concluding: “She engaged in insurrecti­on.”

Beaudrot, however, wrote that there’s no evidence that Greene participat­ed in the attack on the Capitol or that she communicat­ed with or gave directives to people who were involved.

 ?? JOHN BAZEMORE AP ?? U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene enters the courtroom April 22 in Atlanta, where she testified that she had no role in the attack on the Capitol and rejected claims that she shouldn’t be allowed to run for re-election.
JOHN BAZEMORE AP U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene enters the courtroom April 22 in Atlanta, where she testified that she had no role in the attack on the Capitol and rejected claims that she shouldn’t be allowed to run for re-election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States