San Diego Union-Tribune

SPECIAL COUNSEL STEPS UP THE PACE

Smith aggressive­ly advancing probes related to Trump

- BY MAGGIE HABERMAN, GLENN THRUSH & ALAN FEUER Haberman, Thrush and Feuer write for The New York Times.

Did former President Donald Trump consume detailed informatio­n about foreign countries while in office? How extensivel­y did he seek informatio­n about whether voting machines had been tampered with? Did he indicate that he knew he was leaving when his term ended?

Those are among the questions that Justice Department investigat­ors have been directing at witnesses as the special counsel, Jack Smith, takes control of the federal investigat­ions into Trump’s efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss and his handling of classified documents found in his possession after he left office.

Through witness interviews, subpoenas and other steps, Smith has been moving aggressive­ly since being named to take over the inquiries nearly three months ago, seeking to make good on his goal of resolving as quickly as possible whether Trump, still a leading contender for the 2024 Republican presidenti­al nomination, should face charges.

Last week, he issued a subpoena to former Vice President Mike Pence, a potentiall­y vital witness to Trump’s actions and state of mind in the days before the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob.

His prosecutor­s have brought a member of Trump’s legal team, M. Evan

Corcoran, before a federal grand jury investigat­ing why Trump did not return classified informatio­n kept at his Mar-a-Lago residence and private club in Florida. Justice Department officials have interviewe­d at least one other Trump lawyer in connection with the documents case.

Since returning to Washington from The Hague, where he had been a war crimes prosecutor, Smith has set up shop across town from the Justice Department’s

headquarte­rs and has built a team. His operation’s structure seems to closely resemble the organizati­on he oversaw when he ran the Justice Department’s public integrity unit from 2010 to 2015.

In addition to the documents and Jan. 6 investigat­ions, Smith appears to be pursuing an offshoot of the Jan. 6 case, examining Save America, a pro-Trump political action committee, through which Trump raised millions of dollars

with his false claims of election fraud. That investigat­ion includes looking into how and why the committee’s vendors were paid.

Smith has kept a low profile, making no public appearance­s and sticking to a long pattern of empowering subordinat­es rather than interposin­g himself directly in investigat­ions. It is a chainof-command style honed during stints as a war crimes prosecutor in The Hague, a federal prosecutor in Tennessee and, most of all, during

his tenure running the Justice Department’s public integrity unit, which investigat­es elected officials.

A spokespers­on for Smith had no comment.

But various developmen­ts that have surfaced publicly in recent days show his team taking steps on multiple fronts, illustrati­ng how he is wrestling with multiple and sometimes conflictin­g imperative­s of conducting an exhaustive investigat­ion on a strictly circumscri­bed timetable.

The intensifie­d pace of activity speaks to his goal of finishing up before the 2024 campaign gets going in earnest, probably by summer. At the same time, the sheer scale and complexity and the topics he is focused on — and the potential for the legal process to drag on, for example in a likely battle over whether any testimony by Pence would be subject to executive privilege — suggest that coming to firm conclusion­s within a matter of months could be a stretch.

In looking into Trump’s efforts to hold on to power after his election loss and how they led to the Jan. 6 riot, Smith is overseeing a number of investigat­ive strands. The subpoena to Pence indicates that he is seeking testimony that would go straight to the question of Trump’s role in trying to prevent certificat­ion of Joe Biden’s victory in the election and the steps Trump took in drawing a crowd of supporters to Washington and inciting them.

His team is sifting through mountains of testimony provided by the House Jan. 6 committee, including focusing on the so-called fake electors scheme in which some of Trump’s advisers and some campaign officials assembled alternate slates of Trump electors from contested states that he had lost.

While Smith did not ask Attorney General Merrick Garland’s permission to subpoena Pence, one of the most extraordin­ary developmen­ts of his short time as special counsel, he almost certainly consulted him about it.

 ?? ROBIN VAN LONKHUIJSE­N AP ?? Prosecutor Jack Smith (right) and Cezary Michalczuk wait for the start of a trial at The Hague in 2021. Smith was named as special counsel to oversee multiple investigat­ions in the U.S. related to Donald Trump.
ROBIN VAN LONKHUIJSE­N AP Prosecutor Jack Smith (right) and Cezary Michalczuk wait for the start of a trial at The Hague in 2021. Smith was named as special counsel to oversee multiple investigat­ions in the U.S. related to Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States