San Diego Union-Tribune

BILL COULD RESULT IN MORE ORDERED TO INVOLUNTAR­Y MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT

Gloria, other mayors travel to Sacramento to voice support

- BY GARY WARTH

San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria joined other California mayors in Sacramento on Wednesday to urge support for a bill that could increase the number of people ordered into conservato­rship or treatment because of serious mental health issues.

Senate Bill 43, proposed by state Sen. Susan Eggman, D-Stockton, would broaden the term “gravely disabled,” which in California is the condition a person must be in before involuntar­y treatment for mental health can be ordered. The rule dates back to California’s 1967 LantermanP­etris-Short Act, which defines “gravely disabled” as the inability to clothe, feed or shelter oneself.

Advocates who support broadening the term have argued for years that the narrow definition sets the bar for involuntar­y treatment too high, resulting in many people with brain disorders living in homelessne­ss and even dying on the street. Opponents have argued it could result in unnecessar­ily committing people to involuntar­y treatment, while other steps should be taken to improve the mental health system.

Gloria said the bill would redefine the term to apply to someone who is not able to care for his or her medical needs and is at substantia­l risk of death, organ failure or other serious conditions.

“Our current rules absolutely do not make any sense,” Gloria said. “When I’m often asked, ‘Mayor, why aren’t you doing something about this person who is screaming at the top of their lungs on the street corner?’ And when I say, ‘They’re not a threat to themselves or others,’ that rings hollow. And when I deliver that message, it doesn’t feel good to me, either, because I know that person is sick. I know that person needs help.”

At the Sacramento news conference, Eggman said the bill will include people who have substance use disorders that can result in the risk of serious harm.

The bill is similar to last year’s Senate Bill 1416, which was proposed by Eggman but did not get a hearing in the Judiciary Committee. Gloria said he is optimistic that the new bill will be heard this year in the committee, which now is chaired by Assemblyme­mber Brian

Maienschei­n, who served on the San Diego City Council from 2000-2008.

The bill also is similar to Senate Bill 232 proposed by state Sen. Roger Niello, RSacrament­o, which would redefine “gravely disabled” to mean a condition in which a person is incapable of making informed decisions about basic needs or medical care without significan­t supervisio­n and assistance, placing them at risk of substantia­l bodily harm.

The proposals are just the latest legislativ­e acts to mandate mental health treatment for more people. The creation of Laura's Law in 2002 allowed for court-ordered assisted outpatient

treatment for people with serious mental illness and a recent history of psychiatri­c hospitaliz­ations, incarcerat­ions or violent behavior. Gov. Gavin Newsom has called the results disappoint­ing and last year noted that only 218 people in the state were subjected to it in 2021.

The state also is launching the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowermen­t (CARE) Court, which could lead to mandated treatment for many more people with mental health and substance use disorders.

Others attending Wednesday's news conference in Sacramento included San Francisco Mayor London Breed, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, Anaheim Mayor Ashleigh

Aitken, state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, National Alliance on Mental Illness CEO Jessica Cruz and NAMI member Teresa Pasquini, Psychiatri­c Physicians Alliance of California member Dr. Collin Shumate and California State Associatio­n of Psychiatri­sts member Dr. Emily Wood.

Several speakers acknowledg­ed past opposition from civil rights organizati­ons such as Disability Rights California, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Western Center on Law and Poverty, which argued that there was not sufficient evidence to justify expanding the definition, which could infringe on civil rights.

“This is not about mass institutio­nalization like some people would say in a

very alarmist way,” Wiener said, adding that the change would affect a small and focused group of people.

“We will no longer settle for the status quo that has forced too many of our loved ones to die with their rights on,” Pasquini said. “It's time for a right to treatment before tragedy. It's time that we all care together.”

Asked to comment on Eggman's bill, Deb Roth, a senior legislativ­e advocate with Disability Rights California, said her organizati­on opposes it.

“The bill expands the definition of ‘gravely disabled' in a way that is highly speculativ­e and will lead to locking more people up against their will and depriving them of fundamenta­l rights, including privacy and liberty,” she said. “The response should

be to invest in greater voluntary, culturally responsive mental health services and supports to help people get on a path to recovery while maintainin­g their dignity and civil rights. The response should not be to make it easier to lock people up and strip them of their rights.”

Linda Mimms, a Poway resident and vice chair of the national Schizophre­nia & Psychosis Action Alliance. has called for a change in the definition of “gravely disabled” for years and said she supports Eggman's bill.

“I know the new definition is going to be much more inclusive and based on medical necessity,” she said. “The current definition is not based on medical necessity. The LPS (LantermanP­etris-Short) definition of ‘gravely disabled' has been responsibl­e for untold suffering and untold death across our state for over 55 years.”

Mimms said she sees the action as a medical policy issue, not a civil rights issue.

Eggman also has introduced Senate Bill 363, which would create a database to identify in real time the availabili­ty of beds in chemical dependency recovery hospitals, acute psychiatri­c hospitals, mental health rehabilita­tion centers and other facilities.

“It makes no sense for mental health profession­als to be on the phone, with a notebook, calling places to see if there's a bed for somebody in desperate need,” Eggman said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States