San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Investigat­ion:

- By Kimberly Veklerov Kimberly Veklerov is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: kveklerov@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @kveklerov

Cal Fire releases details of probes into the causes of North Bay fires.

The key to investigat­ing the October 2017 fire siege that burned a combined area more than eight times the size of San Francisco came down to a handful of locations, each just a couple of square feet.

The weeks-long probes into what caused a dozen wind-whipped wildfires, and where they originated, began soon after the fires sparked, as thousands of firefighte­rs from across the state and beyond were still working to douse the flames. While scores of firefighti­ng units fanned out to the edges of more than 170 separate blazes, a small contingent went straight to where they thought the destructio­n ignited.

Newly released investigat­ive reports from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection detail the painstakin­g inquiry conducted by a group of fire captains, arson investigat­ors and tree experts who used everything from laser beam technology and cell phone pictures to old-fashioned pattern analysis and tape measures.

They were charged with answering a few basic questions: What happened? Where and how did the fires begin? And were any laws broken?

Cal Fire has completed reports on 16 fires to date. The agency released reports into five of the Northern California fires for which no criminal referrals have been made. Eleven other reports have been given to county and state prosecutor­s for review.

But even where Cal Fire said no violations occurred, the agency determined the fires ignited when electrical lines were disturbed, often by trees falling onto power lines. The findings, in addition to the open question of criminal prosecutio­n, have exposed Pacific Gas and Electric Co. to potentiall­y billions of dollars in damages.

Stephen Pyne, a fire historian at Arizona State University, said fire risk has too often been an afterthoug­ht for communitie­s building their power grids.

“You’ve got hot, dry winds — exactly what you need to drive large, high-intensity fires — and that same set of winds is what interacts with power lines to set the fires,” he said. “You’ve got a structural problem — how you’ve built the way you live on the landscape. The power companies may be liable ... but this is a systemic problem and it’s an infrastruc­ture problem.”

For each of the Northern California fires, investigat­ors used burn indicators — visual cues such as ash deposits, the angle of char and stains — to first identify a general origin area, then a specific origin area and ultimately an ignition spot. They brought in round-the-clock security to ensure nothing in the evidence zone was disturbed and kept logs for every action taken.

The lead investigat­or on the Nuns Fire, which killed two people and burned more than 1,500 buildings and 56,000 acres in Napa and Sonoma counties, described using a color-coded tagging system for a tree top that had crashed into a power line, before a driver transporte­d it to a secure Cal Fire facility.

“I followed (the vehicle) to the evidence storage in my state-issued pickup truck,” the investigat­or, whose name was redacted, wrote in the report. “I never lost sight of (the vehicle) during the transporta­tion of evidence.”

The handling of suspect vegetation wasn’t the only example of the investigat­ors’ attention to detail.

Investigat­ors such as Cal Fire Capt. Eric Bettger, who probed the Redwood Fire in Mendocino County that killed nine people and destroyed more than 500 structures over 37,000 acres, conducted an exclusion analysis to rule out every possible fire cause except power line disturbanc­es. He wrote at length about why he ruled out such causes as lightning, children playing with fire, fireworks, matches, cigarettes, glass refraction, campfires, debris burning, vehicles and more.

At each origin scene, the investigat­ors walked counterclo­ckwise, then clockwise, documentin­g key pieces of evidence with different colored flags as they took hundreds of pictures. They ran magnets over ignition areas to check for metal fragments and other particles.

Other experts inspected tree parts and found that none had rot, defects, disease or pest infestatio­n. The high winds appeared to be the cause of them falling. Doug Wood, a San Francisco attorney who has litigated numerous arson cases and written about fire cause analysis, said the Cal Fire reports will be “absolutely foundation­al evidence” in any civil or criminal case.

“The process of fire investigat­ion has moved from a lot of art and relatively little science to a lot of science and a bit less art,” Wood said.

Nowadays, fire investigat­ors use a standardiz­ed guide establishe­d by the National Fire Protection Associatio­n that’s based on the scientific method, and involves testing and ruling out hypotheses, he said. The investigat­ors are tasked with figuring out the primary ignition source and the first ignited fuel, and why those two things came together.

“Once you figure out the origin correctly and you’ve got a hypothesis, you do your best to disprove it and see if it can withstand all attacks you throw at it,” Wood said. “Fire investigat­ors are not case makers. They’re puzzle solvers.”

 ??  ??
 ?? Peter DaSilva / Special to The Chronicle ?? A burned tree stands near one of many replaced PG&E power poles in Napa.
Peter DaSilva / Special to The Chronicle A burned tree stands near one of many replaced PG&E power poles in Napa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States