San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Technology’s state of crisis demand crisis management

- By Ian I. Mitroff

Make no mistake about it, technology is in a state of crisis of its own making.

Technology has betrayed our deepest sense of trust and well-being. It has allowed itself — indeed, its values are deeply woven into the underlying business model of tech companies — to be used for nefarious purposes.

It has collected and sold without our full awareness, let alone permission, our personal informatio­n to third parties for their gain, not ours. It’s monetized every aspect of our being. It’s provided a platform for fake news and hate speech. It’s allowed foreign government­s to interfere with our elections. It’s served as a vehicle for cyberbully­ing, thereby hounding people every moment of their lives.

One of the deepest fears is that, instead of aiding us, artificial intelligen­ce will take over and control us. In these and countless other ways, technology has sown distrust into the very fabric of society.

Every day brings news of yet another crisis caused by all-too-powerful tech companies. More and more, the crises affect not only them, but all of us as well. When Facebook’s stock took a big hit, for example, it affected tech stocks across the board, thereby negatively impacting the entire economy.

The concerns lie not just with the problemati­c intended uses of technology but the failure to think about and anticipate the unintended uses. Technologi­es are fundamenta­lly abused and misused in ways that their creators didn’t envision, and in far too many cases, didn’t ever want to consider. For instance, from my more than 30 years in the field of crisis management, I’m convinced that virtually all of Facebook’s enumerable crises could have been foreseen if crisis management had been an integral part of the company’s culture and thinking from its founding.

Prior to the Facebook technology’s launch, there is reason to believe that teams of parents, teachers, psychologi­sts and kids would have come up

We are not naive about this. It will take a lot of work. As Frederick Douglass once famously said, “power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

I know the power of American workers and I have experience­d firsthand the benefits of the labor movement. The tide is shifting, and the people are rising. with the possibilit­y of it being used as a vehicle for cyberbully­ing. If steps had been taken before it went live, we still would have had something like Facebook, but hopefully a much more responsibl­e one.

We need a government agency, similar to the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion, to not only oversee the social impacts of technology, but to protect us from those that present a clear danger to our well-being. We must establish panels composed of parents, social scientists, child developmen­t experts, ethicists, crisis management authoritie­s — and kids — to think of as many ways as they can about how a proposed technology could be abused and misused.

Ideally, tech companies would do this on their own. Indeed, research has shown that companies that are proactive in anticipati­ng and planning for crises are substantia­lly more profitable than those that are merely reactive. Crisis management is not only the ethical thing to do, it’s good for business; it heads off major crises before they are too big to fix.

Crisis management needs to be built into every technology, from inception and across its lifetime. As difficult as the invention of a technology is, its management is just as difficult, if not more so. It requires a different set of skills and levels of maturity than that which is needed to invent a technology. We need different types of technologi­sts and tech companies.

But that’s no reason to hesitate: The backlash against technology and tech companies is clearly brewing.

Ian I. Mitroff, professor emeritus from the Marshall School of Business and the Annenberg School of Communicat­ion at the University of Southern California, is the author of “Technology Run Amok: Crisis Management for the Digital Age” (Palgrave MacMillan, 2018). To comment, submit your letter to the editor at SFChronicl­e.com/letters. Mark DeSaulnier, a Democrat, represents Contra Costa County in the U.S. House of Representa­tives, where he serves on the Education and Workforce Committee. Previously, he chaired the California Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations. He is a former union member and small-business owner. To comment: SFChronicl­e.com/letters

 ?? Paramount Pictures 2009 ??
Paramount Pictures 2009

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States