San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

PG&E may need to be restructur­ed rather than rescued

-

Insurers coined the term “moral hazard” to describe the tendency of those insulated from consequenc­es to take more risks. Moral hazard is the reason insurance plans come with deductible­s and too-big-to-fail financial institutio­ns are inherently dangerous.

In September, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill allowing Pacific Gas and Electric Co. to make its customers cover liabilitie­s arising from last year’s Wine Country fires, including California’s most destructiv­e wildfire to date. Less than two months later, the state had a new most destructiv­e wildfire dwarfing previous records, and PG&E was acknowledg­ing suspicious outages near its time and place of origin.

In case this illustrati­on of moral hazard wasn’t clear enough, policymake­rs began discussing the dimensions of the next PG&E bailout while the latest devastatin­g wildfire still burned.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has blamed 17 of last year’s Northern California fires, which caused 44 deaths, on PG&E power lines and other equipment. Investigat­ors found that violations of state law by the utility may have played a role in 11 of them. Yet to be concluded is Cal Fire’s crucial investigat­ion of the Tubbs Fire, which became the deadliest of the year’s blazes and the state’s most destructiv­e so far when it swept into Santa Rosa.

Amid PG&E’s ensuing $2 million-a-month lobbying blitzkrieg, legislator­s formed a special committee that considered broadly excusing the utility from future fire liabilitie­s. They ultimately stopped short of that but did produce a rescue package allowing PG&E to cover catastroph­ic costs stemming from the Wine Country fires through bonds to be paid off by its customers. The lifeline also allows the utility to charge ratepayers for future fires provided regulators find the company acted “reasonably.”

It’s a generous safety net, but PG&E may have found a hole. The bailout provisions apply to the 2017 fires and to future fires starting in 2019, but they leave out 2018 — the year that has now seen the state’s most catastroph­ic wildfire by far.

The Camp Fire, which at least doubled the overall death toll of the Wine Country firestorm and trebled the record destructio­n of the Tubbs Fire as it leveled

much of the town of Paradise, started in the Sierra Nevada foothills on the morning of Nov. 8 — coinciding, PG&E has acknowledg­ed, with two outages in the area. The high-voltage line drawing scrutiny collapsed in a storm six years ago, the Bay Area News Group reported, and other blazes linked to PG&E lines threatened Paradise in 2017 and 2001.

Apparently suspecting a repeat offender, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge William Alsup on Tuesday ordered PG&E to explain its role in the Camp Fire and the Wine Country conflagrat­ion. Alsup is supervisin­g the company’s probation as a result of yet another deadly disaster, the 2010 gas pipeline explosion in San Bruno, and rightly wondering about the implicatio­ns of “any wildfire started by reckless operation or maintenanc­e of PG&E power lines.” The California Public Utilities Commission’s investigat­ion of the company’s safety practices in the wake of the explosion is expected to be expanded to encompass the fires.

The latest fire has emboldened PG&E’s detractors in Sacramento, where the sweeping liability concession­s the utility failed to win last year appear even more unlikely for the time being. State Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, an avid PG&E critic since the utility blew up a neighborho­od he represents, is considerin­g proposals to break up or otherwise overhaul the utility.

But policymake­rs have also taken steps to soothe PG&E’s investors. Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Chairman Chris Holden, D-Pasadena, told Bloomberg he plans to introduce a bill extending the 2017 bailout to 2018.

Though the next bailout, like the last, will be rationaliz­ed as heading off the risks of an unstable PG&E, the dangers posed by the utility in all its supposed stability are more immediate and dire. Restructur­ing this wayward company makes more sense than endless rescues from its havoc-wreaking recidivism.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States