San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Trump’s standoff brings U.S. closer to economic shutdown

-

I was in Bill Clinton’s Cabinet when Newt Gingrich pulled the plug on the federal government in the mid-’90s. It wasn’t a pretty picture. A long shutdown hurts millions of people who rely on government for services and paychecks.

Donald Trump’s shutdown also adds to growing worries about the economy. The stock market is on track for the worst December since the Great Depression. World markets have lost nearly $7 trillion in 2018, making it the worst year since the 2008 financial crisis.

The shutdown is stoking fears that Trump could do something even more alarming. He might fail to authorize an increase in government borrowing before the federal debt reaches the current limit, which Congress extended to March 2. A default by the United States on its obligation­s would be more calamitous than a government shutdown.

All this brings us closer to the economic precipice. It worsens America’s most fundamenta­l economic problem.

Economies depend first and foremost on spending. Otherwise, there’s no reason to produce goods and services. In the United States, consumer spending constitute­s about 70 percent of total demand. The rest comes from government and exports.

Export markets are in trouble. Economies in Europe and China were already slowing before Trump’s trade wars added to the stresses. Government spending was hobbled even before the shutdown by a large public debt, which Trump’s tax cut for big corporatio­ns and the wealthy has made even larger.

American consumers can’t fill in the gap. Most Americans are still living in the shadow of the recession that started in December 2007 and officially ended in June 2009.

More Americans have jobs, to be sure, but their pay has barely risen when adjusted for inflation. Many are worse off because of the escalating costs of housing, health care and education.

Trump has added to their financial burdens by underminin­g the Affordable Care Act, rolling back overtime pay, restrictin­g labor unions, allowing states to cut Medicaid, and imposing tariffs that increase the prices of many goods.

America’s wealthy, meanwhile, have been taking home a growing portion of the nation’s total income. But the rich spend a small fraction of what they earn. The economy depends on the spending of middle-, working-class and poor families.

The only way these Americans have continued to spend is by going deeper into debt. By the third quarter of this year, household debt had reached a record $13.5 trillion. Almost 80 percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.

This isn’t sustainabl­e. Even if the Fed were not raising interest rates — an unwise move under these circumstan­ces — consumers would still be in trouble. Mortgage, auto and student debt delinquenc­ies are already mounting.

The last time household debt was nearly this high was in 2007, just before the recession. Similarly, from 1913 to 1928, the ratio of personal debt to the total national economy nearly doubled. Then came the Great Crash. See a pattern?

The problem isn’t that Americans are living beyond their means. It’s that their means haven’t been keeping up with the growing economy. Most gains have gone to the top. If the majority of households had taken home a larger share of national income, they wouldn’t have needed to go so deeply into debt.

Absent wage growth, American workers can’t continue to buy without going into deeper debt. Yet unless they continue to buy, the economy can’t continue to move forward.

It’s the same sort of trap that preceded the 2008 and 1929 crashes.

After the 1929 crash, the government invented new ways to boost the wages of most Americans — Social Security, unemployme­nt insurance, overtime pay, a minimum wage, the requiremen­t that employers bargain with labor unions, and, finally, a full-employment program called World War II.

By contrast, after the 2007 crash the government bailed out the banks and pumped enough money into the economy to stop the slide. But apart from the Affordable Care Act, nothing was done to address the underlying problem of stagnant wages.

It’s important to understand that the cause of those former collapses wasn’t a banking crisis. It was the growing imbalance between consumer spending and total output — brought on by stagnant wages and widening inequality.

That imbalance is back. Eleven years after the start of the recession, we face another economic precipice. Trump is making it worse.

© 2018 Robert Reich

Robert Reich’s latest book is “The Common Good,” and his newest documentar­y is “Saving Capitalism.” To comment, submit your letter to the editor at SFChronicl­e.com/letters.

 ?? Michael Nagle / Bloomberg ?? An UncleSam inflatable is displayed bythe Bricklayer­s and Allied Craftworke­rs Union Local 1, protesting­belowstand­ard wages, in front of theTrump building at 40 Wall St. in New York. Volatility continues to grip financialm­arkets.
Michael Nagle / Bloomberg An UncleSam inflatable is displayed bythe Bricklayer­s and Allied Craftworke­rs Union Local 1, protesting­belowstand­ard wages, in front of theTrump building at 40 Wall St. in New York. Volatility continues to grip financialm­arkets.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States