San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Email goes 24 karat, at $30 a month

- By Kevin Roose

The year is 2019, and the brainy engineers of Silicon Valley are hunkered down, working on transforma­tive, nextgenera­tion technologi­es like selfdrivin­g cars, digital currencies and quantum computing.

Meanwhile, the buzziest startup in San Francisco is … an expensive email app?

A few months ago, I started hearing about something called Superhuman. It’s an invitation­only service that costs $30 a month and promises “the fastest email experience ever made.” Marc Andreessen, the influentia­l venture capitalist, reportedly swore by it, as did tech bigwigs like Patrick and John Collison, founders of Stripe. The app was rumored to have a waiting list of more than 100,000 people.

“We have the who’s who of Silicon Valley at this point,” Superhuman’s founder, Rahul Vohra, said in an interview. The waiting list is actually 180,000 people long, he said, and some people are getting desperate. He showed me a photo of a glutenfree cake sent to Superhuman’s office by a person who was hoping to score an invitation.

“We have insane levels of virality that haven’t been seen since Dropbox or Slack,” Vohra added. Last month, Superhuman raised a $33 million investment round, led by Andreessen’s firm, Andreessen

Horowitz. That valued the company at roughly $260 million — a steep valuation for an app with fewer than 15,000 customers, but one apparently justified by the company’s trajectory and its support among fans, which borders on evangelica­l.

“Superhuman is the future of work,” said David Ulevitch, the Andreessen Horowitz partner who led the firm’s investment. “Once I started using Superhuman, I couldn’t conceive of relying on anything else.”

When I first heard about Superhuman, I was skeptical. Didn’t Google already solve email? How could any startup get away with charging a premium for something that was already available free? I suspected that it might be a Veblen good, a term economists use for luxury products that primarily function as status symbols for the rich.

But I was curious, so I spent several weeks testing it out. And it turns out that the hype is mostly justified, at least if you’re the kind of person who can spend $30 a month to get your inbox in order.

Signing up for Superhuman is not easy. First, you fill out a long questionna­ire about your email habits and work flow. Then, if you’re approved for access, there’s a mandatory session in which a representa­tive gives you a videoconfe­rence tutorial. In my case, Vohra spent a full hour teaching me how to use the app’s features. Superhuman, which plugs into your existing email account, works with only Gmail and Google G Suite addresses for now, but the company plans to expand to other providers soon.

Some of the app’s features — such as ones that let users undo sending, track when their emails are opened and automatica­lly pull up a contact’s LinkedIn profile — are available in other thirdparty email plugins. But there are bells and whistles that I hadn’t seen before. Like “instant intro,” which moves the sender of an introducto­ry email to bcc, saving you from having to manually reenter that person’s address. Or the scheduling feature, which sees that you’re typing “next Tuesday” and automatica­lly pulls up your calendar for that day.

These features will appeal most to power users who spend most of their day typing on a laptop or desktop. (Superhuman has a mobile app, but much of the heavyduty functional­ity requires a keyboard.) Vohra said the app was targeted at people who spend three or more hours a day checking their email.

“When you’re doing threeplus hours of email every day, it’s your job,” Vohra said. “And every single other job has a tool that makes you do it faster.” Superhuman promises to help VIPs get through their inboxes twice as fast. Partly, that’s because every command has a keyboard shortcut, so a busy power broker never has to waste precious seconds reaching for the mouse. And partly it’s because the app itself is built for speed — it stores informatio­n locally in a user’s browser rather than retrieving it from Google’s servers, which cuts down on the time required to surf between emails.

I am a notoriousl­y bad emailer. My usual Inbox Zero strategy is letting a bunch of important emails pile up in my inbox for months, before going on a guiltdrive­n purge in which every message I send begins with “Sorry for the delay.” But with Superhuman, I bushwhacke­d through my unread emails in less than an hour, eventually reaching a kind of dissociati­ve flow state. Invitation to a blockchain­themed happy hour? Hit command hyphen; to insert a “snippet,” a canned reply politely declining. Newsletter from a hotel I stayed at once in 2014? Hit command hyphen U to unsubscrib­e. It made checking my email feel less like doing work and more like speedrunni­ng a video game in which the object is to annoy as few people as possible.

It’s strange, on one level, to think about my email at all. For years, email felt like a remnant of an earlier technologi­cal era that was fading into obsolescen­ce. Workplace chat apps like Slack sold themselves to large corporatio­ns as “email killers,” and messaging apps replaced email as many people’s primary inboxes.

Yet email lives. In fact, it’s thriving. Nearly 300 billion emails are sent and received per day, according to Radicati, a research firm that studies messaging trends. Even if half of those are spam, that’s an enormous amount of communicat­ion taking place on a decadesold system.

Part of email’s enduring appeal is that it is, at least in theory, manageable. Unlike chat apps, which interrupt you throughout the day, or social media feeds, which are sorted and ranked by algorithms, email is asynchrono­us and usercontro­lled. It can be compartmen­talized and scheduled. It fits into your day, rather than taking it over. And despite the spam, marketing fluff and occasional replyall nightmare that lands in my inbox, it’s still a decent place to get work done.

Vohra, who previously founded another email startup, Rapportive, which was sold to LinkedIn in 2012, thinks that email will dominate our lives for years to come.

“It’s the only thing that’s owned by the company, uniquely identifies you, and allows you to correspond both internally and across companies,” he said.

The 800pound gorilla of email, of course, is Gmail. The 15yearold service has 1.5 billion users and Google’s bottomless resources. If it wanted to, it could simply copy all of Superhuman’s features and offer them free. But Vohra doesn’t think that’s very likely.

“It’s not in Google’s DNA to build premium tooling for relatively small numbers of people,” he said.

As a journalist who gets a fair bit of email, I’m one of those people, and I liked Superhuman more than I expected to. After a few weeks of testing, the worst thing I can say about it is that the idea of giving a startup access to my emails is unnerving. Superhuman says it does not store any user emails on its servers; still, users are required to grant the app full access to their email accounts, which may dissuade some privacy hawks.

In truth, Superhuman’s biggest obstacle may be that most people aren’t power emailers. For the average person, a superpremi­um email experience would be worth the cost only if it automatica­lly read and wrote messages for you, scheduled all your meetings, ordered your lunch and filed your taxes.

But if you are the kind of ultrabusy email hound who can shell out $30 a month — or, better yet, expense it — it’s worth getting behind the velvet rope and seeing what life is like for the inbox 1%.

 ?? Pablo Rochat / New York Times ?? S.F. startup Superhuman is betting on its app’s glitz.
Pablo Rochat / New York Times S.F. startup Superhuman is betting on its app’s glitz.
 ?? Eddie Hernandez / New York Times ?? Superhuman founder and chief executive Rahul Vohra says: “We have the who’s who of Silicon Valley.”
Eddie Hernandez / New York Times Superhuman founder and chief executive Rahul Vohra says: “We have the who’s who of Silicon Valley.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States