San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

U.S. remains on track to pull troops despite violence

- By Robert Burns Robert Burns is an Associated Press writer.

The United States is on course to meet its commitment to the Taliban to withdraw several thousand troops from Afghanista­n by summer, even as violence flares, the peace process is stalled, and Kabul struggles in political deadlock.

U.S. officials say they will reduce to 8,600 troops by July 15 and abandon five bases. And by next spring all foreign forces are supposed to withdraw, ending America’s longest war. Yet the outlook for peace is cloudy at best. In the absence of Afghan peace talks, the Trump administra­tion may face the prospect of fully withdrawin­g even as the Taliban remains at war with the government.

That has concerned some lawmakers, including Rep. Liz Cheney, a Wyoming Republican and member of the House Armed Services Committee. She says the United States needs to keep a military and intelligen­ce presence in Afghanista­n to prevent extremist groups like al Qaeda and the Islamic State’s Afghan affiliate from forming havens from which to attack the U.S.

“Withdrawin­g U.S. troops from Afghanista­n won’t end the war — it will just let the terrorists win,” she said.

Some question whether the U.S.Taliban agreement signed in Doha, Qatar, on Feb. 29, which the Trump administra­tion billed as “a decisive step to achieve a negotiated peace,” was instead mainly a withdrawal agreement. President Trump had campaigned on bringing troops home from foreign wars. And though the Afghan government publicly supported the deal, it did not participat­e directly in the negotiatio­ns and has not, in Washington’s view, capitalize­d on the chance for peace talks.

The deal stipulated that the Taliban would start intraAfgha­n peace negotiatio­ns on

March 10, but that has not happened. The Taliban and the Afghan government also have squabbled over a promised release of each other’s prisoners.

“A lot of this boils down to: Was the U.S.Taliban agreement any kind of serious negotiatio­n at all, or was it just totally a fig leaf to cover abject withdrawal? I suspect the latter,” said Stephen Biddle, a Columbia University professor of internatio­nal affairs and a former adviser to U.S. commanders in Kabul.“It gave away almost all the leverage we had in exchange for virtually nothing,”

The United States has been the prime backer of the Afghan government since it invaded the country soon after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and overthrew the Taliban, which was running the country and harboring al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. According to U.S. government auditors, Washington has committed $86 billion to support Afghan security forces.

The U.S. agreed to withdraw not just military forces but also all intelligen­ce agency personnel, private security contractor­s, trainers and advisers. NATO allied forces also are to withdraw.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States