San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Gig law a tool in quest for unemployme­nt aid

- By Carolyn Said

Oakland resident Cherri Murphy, 53, has spent three years driving full time for Lyft in addition to her volunteer work as a social justice minister. When the coronaviru­s pandemic hit, “I was forced to make a decision:

Do something that could kill me, or pay my bills?”

She stopped driving in

March because of the risk of contractin­g the coronaviru­s and immediatel­y applied for unemployme­nt benefits. The California

Employment Developmen­t

Department sent her an award letter showing what she is entitled to: zero dollars.

Because Lyft and Uber classify drivers as contractor­s, they don’t report their wages to EDD and don’t pay into the state unemployme­nt fund. Until recently, gig workers were not entitled to unemployme­nt benefits. In late April EDD created a way for gig work

“I was forced to make a decision: Do something that could kill me or pay my bills?”

Cherri Murphy, Lyft driver of Oakland

ers and other selfemploy­ed people to apply for the new federally funded Pandemic Unemployme­nt Assistance program, which Congress created to respond to the crisis. As of Thursday, 882,760 California­ns had applied for PUA.

But Murphy is adamant that she is an employee under AB5, California’s gig work law that took effect Jan. 1, and thus should receive regular unemployme­nt, not the PUA for gig workers.

“I deserve the same amount of benefits (as an employee); I deserve to be protected,” she said. So she asked EDD for a wage investigat­ion, even though that means a decision — and any money — could take months. Meanwhile, her social justice and faith communitie­s are financiall­y supporting her, she said.

Murphy is among activists, lawyers and drivers, including many from Rideshare Drivers United, an organizing group of about 17,000 California drivers, who want Uber and Lyft drivers to receive regular unemployme­nt as employees, not gig workers.

They say the benefits could add up to more and last longer. More importantl­y, said Keith Eberl, a Los Angeles Uber and Lyft driver, “It’s the principle of the thing: We want to hold Uber and Lyft accountabl­e.”

But Uber and Lyft, as well as the campaign committee behind their $110 million ballot measure that seeks to exempt drivers and couriers from AB5, say the activists’ arguments don’t hold water. They said drivers might get fewer benefits and longer waits by filing as employees. And they point to independen­t surveys that about 71% of drivers nationwide prefer to be independen­t contractor­s (albeit with the caveat that most want to set their own rates, which Uber and Lyft do not allow). “We agree that EDD should work quickly to get drivers the relief they’re entitled to,” Lyft said in a statement. “But forcing an employment model on drivers who don’t want it would have dangerous economic consequenc­es.”

In the larger picture, Lyft said, if drivers were employees, far fewer would have work. It referred to a study the campaign commission­ed that said the five gig companies behind the measure, which also include DoorDash, Instacart and Postmates, would hire only about 10% to 20% of their current 1 million California drivers and couriers if they were employees.

On the other side of the argument, legal advocates and labor groups last week wrote to California Labor Secretary Julie Su to point out an inconsiste­ncy. California’s attorney general, along with the city attorneys of San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego, sued Uber and Lyft last month, saying drivers should be employees under AB5. Meanwhile, EDD, a state agency, does not treat drivers as employees, they wrote.

By telling drivers to seek PUA benefits, EDD “effectivel­y validates and rewards (Uber’s and Lyft’s) blatant business strategy to conduct business outside the law with a government subsidy and shortchang­es the workers,” the letter said. The authors want the agency to change how it handles unemployme­nt claims by gig workers who say they are misclassif­ied.

The state agencies in question said they are addressing who’s a gig worker versus an employee, but did not give any details.

“California has been a national leader in the fight against widespread and systematic employer misclassif­ication,” said the Labor & Workforce Developmen­t Agency.

“Workers who believe they have been misclassif­ied as an independen­t contractor and actually earned wages as an employee are encouraged to file a claim for regular unemployme­nt benefits,” said EDD spokeswoma­n Loree Levy in an email that used identical language to a letter that Su, the labor secretary, sent to legislator­s last month.

EDD will investigat­e and request informatio­n from the claimant and the employer, Levee and Su said, but this process can take longer than the threeweek average for regular unemployme­nt claims.

“EDD has requested such wage data in bulk (from companies) in some instances in an effort to expedite these claims,” Levy and Su said. Levy would not say whether those companies include Uber and Lyft because of confidenti­ality laws.

“In addition, like all claimants, appbased drivers are able to apply for PUA if they do not have monetary eligibilit­y for UI based on employer-reported wages in the base wage file,” both Su and Levy wrote.

Stacey Wells, a spokeswoma­n for the Uber/Lyft/ DoorDash ballot campaign, reacted to Su’s wording. “That phrase is a nice dance to try and avoid igniting any wrath from labor,” she wrote in an email. “The companies don’t report wages to EDD because drivers aren’t employees.”

Uber said it has online guides in all 50 states to help drivers apply for PUA. “Congress fully funded pandemic unemployme­nt assistance for gig workers so that every state, many of which face historic deficits, could give these workers immediate financial support at no cost to their own state funds,” Uber said in a statement.

Here’s a breakdown on issues in weighing regular unemployme­nt versus PUA:

Amounts: Regular unemployme­nt is based on gross earnings, while PUA is based on net earnings. That could make a big difference in weekly benefits. (The same is true for other selfemploy­ed folks, who often rack up many deductions to reduce their tax bill.)

“For a lot of drivers, net earnings when you deduct all the expenses ends up being much lower, so their weekly benefit amount could potentiall­y be lower,” said Carole Vigne, staff attorney at Legal Aid at Work, which signed the letter to Su.

Eberl, the Los Angeles driver, said his net earnings, after subtractin­g tens of thousands for gas, maintenanc­e, insurance, Uber and Lyft’s commission­s, were less than half of his gross earnings.

He spent weeks calling and emailing EDD to insist on an audit of his claim. Eventually, EDD did what it calls a tax audit, and awarded him regular unemployme­nt, dating back to his original filing date of March 22. Since it was based on his gross earnings, he got the maximum amount of $450 a week, plus the extra $600 a week.

Through Rideshare Drivers United, he’s consulted with other drivers who also want regular unemployme­nt and ran into similar roadblocks, he said. Eberl said EDD staffers were rude and even hung up on him when he insisted that he was an employee of Uber and Lyft.

To get regular unemployme­nt, “our claims have to be referred to (a wage investigat­ion) by a claim processor, the folks who answer our phone calls, and receive our mail and emails,” he said. “Those people have been obstructin­g our path by not offering referral as an option, refusing to refer our claims when we ask them to, trying to push us into applying for PUA, which can pay much less, or just hanging up on us. ... It is really galling to have state employees wrongfully deny us access to our right to unemployme­nt insurance benefits.”

Benefit minimum: PUA has a higher weekly minimum ($167) than regular unemployme­nt ($40). Both benefits include an additional $600 a week until July 31. For someone who made less than $4,316 in their highest earning quarter, PUA would provide more weekly money. Speed to receive benefits: Regular unemployme­nt takes about three weeks to process. Appeals for gig workers who want to receive regular unemployme­nt can take much longer. PUA claims are processed in a few days. “Especially for people who are getting desperate — and many people are — PUA becomes much more appealing if it’s the faster option,” Vigne said. Length of benefits: PUA provides up to 39 weeks of benefits and ends on Dec. 31 unless Congress extends it. Regular unemployme­nt in California is now 52 weeks — 26 weeks of regular benefits, 13 weeks under Pandemic Emergency Unemployme­nt Compensati­on, and another 13 weeks under extended benefits, a federal program for states with high unemployme­nt rates.

Returning to work: For employees, returning to work is out of their control: It depends on an employer rehiring them or ending a furlough. By contrast, gig workers can decide for themselves when to stop working, start up and again and which companies to work with, Lyft said. Ridehailin­g demand has plummeted during stayathome orders, which would limit earnings. However, independen­t contractor­s can readily switch to other gigs such as delivering meals, groceries or other items, and can work for multiple companies, Lyft said.

Multiple jobs: About fourfifths of Uber and Lyft drivers put in less than 20 hours a week, the companies said. That implies that many have other jobs, either as freelancer­s or employees. People with more than one W2 (regular employment) job can add together multiple salaries to calculate their base income. Getting unemployme­nt’s maximum $450 a week requires making at least $11,674 in one’s highest earning quarter.

Benefits for people with hybrid income — some freelance, some regular employment — are based only on W2 (regular employment) income under federal law. Such people would benefit by being able to count Uber/ Lyft income as regular employment “so they can get as much income into their base period as possible,” Vigne said.

Who pays? The federal government is picking up the tab for PUA. Regular unemployme­nt is paid for by a tax employers must pay on workers’ income. With a deluge of pandemic claims, California already exhausted its unemployme­nt fund and had to get an infusion of federal money.

A report by the UC Berkeley Labor Center, which has been vocal in its belief that drivers should be employees, said that Uber and Lyft would have had to pay $413 million into the state unemployme­nt insurance fund from 2014 to 2019 if their drivers had been employees.

But the companies retorted that the study was based on a false premise. If drivers were employees, they would have had far fewer of them, they said.

How to decide? “People should do what they think is the right approach for them” in deciding which to pursue, said Michael Bernick, an attorney with Duane Morris and a former head of EDD, who was hired by the ballot campaign to give a webinar and other info to drivers on filing for unemployme­nt. “EDD looks into each claim on an individual basis. It’s clear that if you file for PUA, it moves very quickly.”

But, he said, EDD, is an administra­tor, not a judicial or legislativ­e body, so needs guidance on policy issues such as classifica­tions.

 ?? Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle 2019 ??
Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle 2019
 ?? Carlos Avila Gonzalez / The Chronicle ?? Above: Whether Uber or Lyft drivers are classified as employees affects their benefits during the pandemic.
Left: Cherri Murphy drove full time for Lyft until the pandemic hit. She applied for unemployme­nt as an employee because that’s how she thinks Lyft should classify her under AB5.
Carlos Avila Gonzalez / The Chronicle Above: Whether Uber or Lyft drivers are classified as employees affects their benefits during the pandemic. Left: Cherri Murphy drove full time for Lyft until the pandemic hit. She applied for unemployme­nt as an employee because that’s how she thinks Lyft should classify her under AB5.
 ?? Carlos Avila Gonzalez / The Chronicle ?? Above: Cherri Murphy of Oakland says that as a Lyft driver she is entitled to unemployme­nt benefits under AB5. Left: Uber also says its drivers are contractor­s, which affects their jobless benefits.
Carlos Avila Gonzalez / The Chronicle Above: Cherri Murphy of Oakland says that as a Lyft driver she is entitled to unemployme­nt benefits under AB5. Left: Uber also says its drivers are contractor­s, which affects their jobless benefits.
 ?? Justin Sullivan / Getty Images ??
Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States