San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

California needs new party to deliver life’s necessitie­s

- — Marshall Kilduff; mkilduff@ sfchronicl­e. com

Igot one of those calls again — they come every six months — from a Silicon Valley hotshot who wants to use his brain and his wealth to fix what ails California. This investor asked the same old: What measures might I put on the ballot to reform the state’s politics and governance?

On the phone, I was dismissive. Don’t you know, smartrich guy, that California’s government­al dysfunctio­n is built on top of ballot initiative­s that don’t work? Passing more initiative­s is like trying to fix the Winchester Mystery House by adding more rooms, dude. California needs a new system, with a new Constituti­on, I told him.

Of course, I couldn’t tell him how to persuade enough people to change the system, because no one has figured that out yet. But soon thereafter, I was rereading a book, “How America’s Political Parties Change ( and How They Don’t),” by Michael Barone, who edits the Almanac of American Politics, when a thought occurred: If you want to make big changes in California, you might need a new political party.

By convention­al political wisdom, new parties are crazy ideas. As Barone wrote, America’s political parties are history’s most enduring; the Democrats are the world’s oldest political party. The Republican are third oldest. These parties survive because our electoral system incentiviz­es having just two parties. Rare is the moment when a new party can alter the system.

Of course, we are now in a very rare moment. But rare enough to birth a true unicorn — a political party?

I dare to say the answer is yes. California history tells us that new parties can bring the greatest changes — be they the Republican­s who formed our state’s institutio­ns in the 1850s, or the Workingmen’s Party that establishe­d our constituti­onal structure in the late 1870s, or the Progressiv­e Party, which establishe­d women’s suffrage, independen­t commission­s and direct democracy in the 1910s.

Our present circumstan­ces cry out for new parties. The Republican­s have cracked up and reconstitu­ted themselves as a social club for conspiracy­mongering. Meanwhile the dominant Democrats, obsessed with national politics and owned by labor unions, pursue narrow policies instead of providing the basics California­ns are lacking: education, health care, housing, stable economy and energy that doesn’t shut off.

Since neither party can deliver life’s essentials, we need a new political force that can.

We need a Water Party.

Why Water? Because it’s something we all require. Because water puts out

Rare is the moment when a new party can alter the system. Then again, we are now in a very rare moment in the state.

fires. And because it defines our state, and its dysfunctio­n. Water — our rivers, our coast — is all around us, and yet we manage it so poorly that we don’t have nearly enough of it.

But mostly, water is the metaphor that shows us the way out of our nasty contradict­ions.

California­ns cling to old infrastruc­ture and systems, even ones that aren’t working. But water can wash away the past.

California is split up between regions and thousands of local government­s. All those pieces don’t fit together. But water naturally fills in such cracks.

In California, we often prefer to let decisions be made by algorithms and formulas. Perhaps we should leave more of the decisions to humans, who are half water.

Indeed, our state, so full of constraint­s and limits, needs to rededicate itself to the value of flexibilit­y. Because we will need to be fluid to deal with the difficulti­es and horrors of the future. In this, the Water Party would do well to adopt the practical philosophy of the San Franciscob­orn martial artist and film star Bruce Lee, who famously advised:

Be formless, shapeless — like water. Now you put water in a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle, it becomes the bottle. You put it in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.

The people now in charge of California will dismiss the idea of a Water Party, just as I dismissed that Silicon Valley caller, but their actual behavior betrays their desperate wish that they could be more like water. Look at Gov. Gavin Newsom, who, caught in the inflexible vise of state government, keeps forming task forces, strike teams and special commission­s that have more freedom and fluidity to dig into the big problems and respond to all of our current emergencie­s.

Online at sfchronicl­e. com/ opinion

Read additional commentary, including past pieces you may have missed. Forming the party itself wouldn’t be so hard. Under state regulation­s, you must first hold a party caucus or convention, and then qualify as a party either by collecting enough voter registrati­ons, or sufficient signatures on a petition.

By starting from scratch, a Water Party wouldn’t have to follow the practices of the Democrats or Republican­s; it could forge new ideas and new practices to fit our age of apocalypse. The Water Party could experiment with “liquid democracy,” a system in which voters can either vote on issues themselves, or turn their vote over to a personal proxy. Or, like Italy’s Five Star Movement, it could build an online environmen­t to allow its members to determine candidates and policy positions directly.

In his book, published last year, Barone predicted the continued dominance of the Democrats and Republican­s, arguing that “the parties have been a force for stability.” But right now, the parties themselves feel unstable, with some of the most bitter fighting happening not between the parties, but within them.

Around the world, traditiona­l parties of left and right have split apart in recent years. It’s no longer hard to imagine the Democrats dividing between Democratic Socialists and Social Democrats, and the Republican­s splitting between White Nationalis­ts and Never Trumpers.

At a time of such uncertaint­y, a flexible, California­centric party, devoted to water and the other basics, would have enormous value. The nation’s rigid divide might crack up, but California would have a force fluid enough to shape a better future.

Be water, my party.

Joe Mathews writes the Connecting California column for Zócalo Public Square.

A: B: C: B: C: A: B: C:

Animal loving security guards Stars in Korean super hero movie Militia charged in Michigan governor kidnap try

A: B: C:

Number of available hospital beds Infection rate among minorities Percentage of young people with the bug

A: B: C: A: B: C:

8%, not so bad

14%, highest in 9 years 23%, lowest in the nation

What is dexamethas­one? A:

Curative given to injured 49ers Steroid tried on Trump Chemical in water to harden teeth

Who are the Wolverine Watchmen?

Tiffany & Saks Nordstrom & Chanel CVS and Walgreens

Trump’s physician Dr. Sean Conley Debate fly on VP Mike Pence’s head Actor Dwayne “the Rock” Johnson

Fred the falcon Potter the otter Barney the beagle

B. 10- C, 9- B, 8- C, 7- C, 6- B, 5- B, 4- A, 3- A, 2- A, 1- Answers:

 ?? Getty Images / iStockphot­o ??
Getty Images / iStockphot­o

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States