San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

California no longer needs a capital

- By Joe Mathews Joe Mathews writes for Zócalo Public Square, a Los Angeles media nonprofit affiliated with Arizona State University. — Spencer Whitney; swhitney@sfchronicl­e.com

Why bother maintainin­g a state capital? California­ns certainly shouldn’t. The pandemic demonstrat­ed what things are essential in California, and what things we can live without. Among our superfluou­s assets: the designatio­n of Sacramento as our capital city, and the various buildings occupied by our state government there.

In the biggest emergency of our lives, our elected officials managed to respond and govern with the Capitol, the seat of government, closed. Public employees in Sacramento­based agencies kept the government running while working remotely or from home.

Having the capital effectivel­y closed didn’t diminish state ambitions. To the contrary, there was a historic expansion in state government and its goals, with new programs in health and homelessne­ss launched on the fly, and the state budget growing at record speed.

And rather than limiting public access to state government, the absence of a capital brought regular people closer to our government than ever before. Suddenly, Southern California­ns like me — who used to have to drive eight hours or get on a plane to attend a hearing or session in Sacramento — could participat­e online from our kitchens. California­ns could join calls where decisions of great consequenc­e, including about opening and closing public institutio­ns, were made. Meanwhile, state officials including the governor, who are traditiona­lly cocooned inside wellguarde­d Sacramento buildings, were forced to meet people outside in every corner of the state.

This pandemic decentrali­zation served two of California’s greatest causes: equity and environmen­tal protection. Before COVID19, you needed resources — either in time to travel to

Sacramento or in money to hire a lobbyist — to get yourself heard by the state government. The pandemic made it possible for officials to see and hear everyday California­ns, especially in the working class, as never before. The pandemic closures also saw state employees reduce their greenhouse­gasproduci­ng commutes, and limited the number of flights to and from Sacramento.

None of these changes, of course, should have required a pandemic to be implemente­d. This state is a global technology capital that long ago should have moved beyond the antiquated idea of having to gather its government in one city. But entrenched interests in Sacramento long resisted applying technology to state government in ways that might make it more accessible—until the pandemic forced their hand.

Now that the pandemic is winding down, California­ns should rally together to make sure that power is never restored to the capital.

That won’t be easy. The powersthat­be in Sacramento, desperate to protect their money and prerogativ­es, are already demanding a return to the bizarrely centralize­d California governance that they call “normal.”

The Sacramento Bee, in an awful editorial, recently demanded that state workers return to the city’s downtown. Their selfservin­g reason: protecting local property tax, hotel tax, and parking revenues that the city of Sacramento needs to pay off illconceiv­ed public investment­s in downtown developmen­ts, including an arena for its miserable pro basketball franchise.

The editorial omitted the larger context: Sacramento’s rapid downtown growth is an artificial­ly created bubble, built on the dysfunctio­nal and overly centralize­d Propositio­n 13 tax system. That system requires the rest of California to send its local revenues to Sacramento and then hire expensive lobbyists to try to return some of those dollars back home.

But if California ended Sacramento’s status as its capital, the biggest winner might be Sacramento itself. The nolongerca­pital city would have the rare opportunit­y for a fresh start, including a more balanced economy. The loss of government jobs would take some pressure off rapidly escalating housing prices there.

And the Capitol and state buildings left behind could be repurposed for housing or other offices. Thinking bigger, Sacramento could become home to a huge new Cal Poly or University of California campus that would allow those systems to serve more students — and produce more new economic

What is the name of Steven Spielberg’s production company? A: Amblin Partner

B: Columbia Pictures

C: Relativity Media

What did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that the NCAA can no longer prevent Division 1 schools from doing?

A: Providing insurance for student athletes

B: Offering educationa­l incentives to attract recruits

C: Waitlistin­g student athletes

Which county dropped its vaccine check requiremen­t?

Santa Clara County

Marin County

Alameda County possibilit­ies for Sacramento than state office workers.

Giving up on the idea of the capital could benefit the rest of California, too. And this goes beyond the billions of taxpayer dollars that could be saved by not constructi­ng more unnecessar­y state buildings, like the new California Natural Resources Agency headquarte­rs. While politician­s will argue that they can get more done by meeting together in Sacramento, the truth is that elected leaders are far more effective and responsive when they are seeing their constituen­ts more than their colleagues.

Offering Sacramento­based state workers incentives to relocate to poorer neighborho­ods around the state would also put their stable incomes and pensions in the service of regional equity. Local government­s would find it easier to cooperate productive­ly with the state if more workers and offices were spread among our communitie­s. And a state workforce extending into every corner of California should be more responsive to local concerns.

Of course, total decentrali­zation is not possible. State legislator­s may well insist on holding some sessions and meetings all together. If they do, the location should rotate among different places, as my friend, the former deputy state treasurer and journalist Mark Paul, has suggested. To raise revenue, the state government could even put the right to host the Legislatur­e up for bids from different cities and counties — like with the Super Bowl or the Olympics.

California is too great and large of a place to have a single center or seat of power. The state government should be present, and accessible, wherever you can find one of California’s greatest assets — its nearly 40 million people.

Where will Mexican painter Diego Rivera’s mural be unveiled?

A: Masterwork­s Fine Art Gallery

B: Oakland Museum of California

C: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Which neighborho­ods saw the highest average increase from list price to sales price in housing? A: St. Francis Wood

B: Sunset/Parkside

C: Bernal Heights

How many residents are there for each fire station in the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District? A: 17,000

B: 26,380

C: 42,667

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States