San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Make housing a priority

- Charlie Sobeck, San Jose Matthew O. Franklin, Foster City

Regarding “Vaccine checks are unnecessar­y” (Open Forum, Oct. 29): The writer makes some fundamenta­l errors. The concept of risk analysis and assessment described applies to the identifica­tion and evaluation of mitigation approaches (e.g. seat belts are an effective mitigation against accidental injuries). Even the writer agrees that the approach was effectivel­y used.

But the writer oversteps by suggesting the process works the same in evaluating the process of enforcemen­t. The writer identifies a trifecta of reduced infections, reduced severity and an effective mitigation of COVID. This is not a trifecta because the three facts are not independen­t. We have an effective vaccine, which has reduced infections and their severity. But those effects will not persist if the vaccine is not taken.

Vaccinatio­n must be enforced. It is valid to question how this should be done (I agree that individual businesses are poorly suited to the task), but it is incorrect to suggest that the risk methodolog­y is the appropriat­e means to measure the effectiven­ess of the enforcemen­t approach.

Regarding “Politics could gut housing funds” (Editorial, Oct. 27): The Build Back Better legislatio­n making its way through Congress is an opportunit­y for the federal government to get it right on affordable housing and homelessne­ss. At stake is the creation of 2 million affordable homes over 10 years, including 330,000 in California.

The Chronicle’s editorial highlights how California could be shortchang­ed if all the housing dollars in the bill remain as is: designated only for public housing capital investment­s. Very few public

Chef Mathew Broadway checks a vaccinatio­n card in August at Vegan Picnic in San Francisco. Some argue that restaurant­s shouldn’t be the vaccine police.

housing units remain in the state because most housing authoritie­s have or are in the process of transition­ing these units to private ownership using the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

California­ns understand that producing more affordable housing is the only way to alleviate our housing crunch. That is why Gov. Gavin Newsom’s top housing priority in the bill are provisions that would expand federal tax credit resources.

To see how the shortage of bonds is playing out in San Francisco, look no further than MidPen Housing’s shovelread­y project, Shirley Chisholm Village, 135 homes in the Outer Sunset neighborho­od that will serve city school district educators and their families. It is shovel ready but for the lack of LowIncome

Housing Tax Credit resources.

California’s housing crisis requires investment beyond public housing.

 ?? Jana Asenbrenne­rova / Special to The Chronicle ??
Jana Asenbrenne­rova / Special to The Chronicle

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States