San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Kenosha verdict highlights depth of political divide

- By Jennifer Medina and Reid J. Epstein Jennifer Medina and Reid J. Epstein are New York Times writers.

Like so much else in modern America, Friday’s acquittal of Kyle Rittenhous­e both revealed and widened the split between the country’s hostile political factions, with conservati­ves calling it a victory for the right to defend yourself and liberals condemning it as a miscarriag­e of justice.

Mainstream and far-right Republican­s alike celebrated the not guilty verdict for Rittenhous­e, an 18-year-old who last year shot and killed two men and wounded another during protests over the police shooting of a Black man in Kenosha, Wis.

In Wisconsin, Sen. Ron Johnson said that “justice has been served.” Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas said on Twitter that “the Rittenhous­e verdict reminds us we have the moral & legal right to self-defense.” And former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said the verdict “renews our faith in the jury system.”

On the far right, many saw the verdict as vindicatio­n and encouragem­ent. Rep. Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina told supporters in a video that “you have a right to defend yourself ” and advised them to “be armed, be dangerous and be moral.” And on social media, one popular meme circulatin­g among accounts associated with the far-right group the Proud Boys showed Rittenhous­e in a tuxedo offering a Champagne toast.

Democrats called the verdict an endorsemen­t of violence. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said it was a message to “armed vigilantes” that “you can break the law, carry around weapons built for a

Marchers in New York City rally Friday against the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhous­e, who fatally shot two men and wounded another during demonstrat­ions over police conduct.

military, shoot and kill people, and get away with it.” And Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio, chair of the Congressio­nal Black Caucus, called the verdict “unconscion­able” and Rittenhous­e’s self-defense claim “ludicrous.”

The case was so politicize­d that it drew fundraisin­g on both sides, with at least one political action committee using anger at Rittenhous­e to

raise money for progressiv­e candidates and Rittenhous­e’s supporters raising money to subsidize his legal fees.

The shooting made Rittenhous­e an instant conservati­ve celebrity. Republican politician­s, in search of attention and small-dollar campaign contributi­ons, tried tying themselves to Rittenhous­e. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Cawthorn publicly offered him

internship­s in their congressio­nal offices.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, called for a federal review of the verdict by the Justice Department, describing it as a “miscarriag­e of justice.”

 ?? Stephanie Keith / New York Times ??
Stephanie Keith / New York Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States