San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Nevada passes expansive Equal Rights Amendment

- By Gabe Stern

RENO — Nevada voters have adopted what is widely considered the most comprehens­ive state version of the Equal Rights Amendment in the nation, a sweeping update that puts protection­s in the state Constituti­on for people who have historical­ly been marginaliz­ed.

Nevada’s ERA amends the state Constituti­on to ensure equal rights for all, “regardless of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientatio­n, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.”

It is a more wide-ranging amendment than the federal ERA that Nevada adopted in 2017, which outlaws discrimina­tion based on sex, though the push to ratify it in the U.S. Constituti­on remains gridlocked.

Proponents of Nevada’s amendment say that it will provide new tools to challenge discrimina­tion and close loopholes where those rights are not necessaril­y guaranteed.

Nevada Sen. Pat Spearman, a Democrat from North Las Vegas who co-sponsored the bill to get it on the ballot, cited age protection­s for older workers laid off during the pandemic and transgende­r people having their identity protected as tangible difference­s that the amendment will make.

In a statement after the vote, the committee backing the initiative said it was “thrilled to see the overwhelmi­ng support” for the measure.

“Nevadans have decisively rejected hate and unequivoca­lly declared that our difference­s should be celebrated and protected under law,” the group said.

Opposition to the ERA came from mostly conservati­ve groups who oppose protection­s for gender identity and expression as well as age. They argued that expanding rights for gay marriage could infringe on freedom of religion.

They also argued against added protection­s for transgende­r people to use bathrooms or compete in sports that align with their gender identity.

It’s unclear how the amendment will be implemente­d, though it will probably be through the courts.

In 2020, versions of the federal amendment had been adopted by 38 states, pushing it over the threshold to be adopted federally.

However, that came decades after the ratificati­on deadline Congress set after it was passed in 1972, and five states — Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky and South Dakota — have tried to remove their previous approval.

States can declare their support for the federal version individual­ly, though it is not ratified into the U.S. Constituti­on, so those ratificati­ons remain mostly symbolic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States