San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Address seen as missed opportunit­y on Roe

- By Lisa Lerer

During the midterm campaigns, Democrats spent months focused on the demise of federal abortion rights and the danger they said it posed to all Americans.

In his State of the Union speech, President Joe Biden spent roughly 42 seconds.

The White House says that it used the moment to call on Congress to reinstate the protection­s provided under Roe v. Wade, and that it has taken the most aggressive approach to abortion rights of any administra­tion in history. But some abortion rights supporters said they saw the brief mention as a missed opportunit­y to leverage the power of the bully pulpit in what they often describe as a national health crisis. They were also mystified that the president passed up a chance to play up his own record, which nearly all praised.

“President Biden’s remarks on the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade were disappoint­ing and a lost opportunit­y,” said Nancy Northup, president and chief executive of the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights, which argued the case over Roe at the Supreme Court. “As demonstrat­ed resounding­ly in the midterms, abortion rights are a kitchen-table issue that Americans care deeply about, and highlighti­ng that reality would have fit into the president’s theme of fundamenta­l fairness.”

The criticism reflects Democrats’ limited options on the federal level, as the fight has shifted to state legislatur­es. The issue became a potent tool for the party in the midterms, energizing voters and staving off some expected defeats. But after Democrats lost control of the House, it became all but impossible for them to fulfill promises to reinstate a federal right to abortion.

Since the court ruling in June, Biden has signed a series of executive orders protecting access to medication abortion and contracept­ion, ensuring emergency medical care for pregnant women and protecting patient privacy. But at times his administra­tion has fallen short in activists’ eyes, including in declining to declare a national emergency over the summer. The administra­tion says such a measure wouldn’t offer any new tools to combat the restrictio­ns.

The White House believes Biden has most likely reached the legal limits of his powers through executive actions, leaving few options other than rallying voters and providing assistance to Democratic state legislator­s working to stop or undo restrictio­ns.

Mini Timmaraju, the president of NARAL ProChoice America, praised Vice President Kamala Harris’ efforts and called Biden the “most pro-choice reproducti­ve freedom president” in history, saying abortion rights got more attention than in any previous State of the Union.

“The tension is that he represents a lot of progress, but it’s never going to feel like enough because we’re in a crisis,” she said. “Everybody in our community wishes we had more of the president’s time, more of the president’s attention, more presence in that State of the Union, but that being said, I keep going back to judging this administra­tion on what they’re getting done.”

On Tuesday night, Biden mentioned the battle over abortion rights an hour into his 80-minute speech, typically a moment for presidents to outline their priorities.

He did not propose any new policy initiative­s on the issue. Nor did he describe the struggles of the guests invited by a number of Democratic lawmakers and first lady Jill Biden who represente­d the issue. Jill Biden brought a Texas woman who almost died from sepsis after the state’s abortion restrictio­ns caused a delay in treatment for her pregnancy.

“Congress must restore the right that was taken away in Roe v. Wade and protect Roe v. Wade,” he said. “The vice president and I are doing everything to protect access to reproducti­ve health care and safeguard patient safety. But already, more than a dozen states are enforcing extreme abortion bans.”He added, “Make no mistake about it: If Congress passes a national ban, I will veto it.”

Any sweeping abortion action remains unlikely given the divided control of Congress. Democrats lack the votes in the Senate, and Biden is unable to grant Roe’s protection­s through executive action.

In a statement released after the speech, Planned Parenthood Action Fund highlighte­d the nine abortion patients, providers and advocates invited by Jill Biden and Democratic lawmakers as guests to the speech. The group “is grateful to have a trusted partner in the Biden administra­tion,” it wrote, and declined to offer additional remarks.

While they’ve been pleased with this administra­tion’s actions, some leaders of the abortion rights movement would like to see Biden talk more specifical­ly about plans to expand access to the procedure.

“We really wanted to hear what the administra­tion is prepared to do for the current reality of abortion access and the continued threats that exist across the country,” said Morgan Hopkins, president of All* Above All, a reproducti­ve justice coalition. “We didn’t hear that.”

The moment is particular­ly fraught, as activists and the administra­tion await a ruling as soon as this week in a Texas case brought by conservati­ve groups seeking to revoke a more than two-decade-old federal approval of mifepristo­ne, a common medication abortion pill. The decision will be made by a single judge, Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee known for his conservati­ve views on social issues.

Given that medication accounts for more than half of abortions and that the pills have become a way for some women to circumvent state bans, a ruling against the drug could have sweeping impacts. Any appeal of the decision would go to the right-leaning 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and, eventually, to the Supreme Court with its conservati­ve majority.

Last week, Xavier Becerra, the secretary of health and human services, met with abortion providers at a clinic in Alexandria, Virginia. And a number of agencies, coordinate­d by the White House, are planning for a variety of outcomes, though they are limited in terms of executive actions.

 ?? Haiyun Jiang/New York Times 2022 ?? Activists say last week’s address by President Biden, shown speaking on abortion rights in Washington last year, could have done more to address the issue.
Haiyun Jiang/New York Times 2022 Activists say last week’s address by President Biden, shown speaking on abortion rights in Washington last year, could have done more to address the issue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States