San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Exclusive interview with surfing sea otter

- By Aggressive Santa Cruz Otter and as told to Joe Mathews Joe Mathews writes the Connecting California column for Zócalo Public Square.

Who are you to be calling me aggressive?

Yes, I’m the 5-year-old female otter, from Santa Cruz, about whom you’ve been reading scare headlines.

Now, I do sometimes approach surfers or kayakers in ways they interpret as threatenin­g. And, on occasion, I separate surfers from their boards and exercise my right, as a California­n, to ride the waves myself.

But have I ever done anything truly aggressive, at least by Santa Cruz standards? It’s not like I ever swiped a street parking space near the Boardwalk, or bid $200,000 over asking on a three-bedroom in Seabright.

Which is why it’s downright slanderous to say, as the city of Santa Cruz has on signs posted near the coast, that I’m an “aggressive sea otter” so dangerous that people shouldn’t go in the water. And if I could hire a lawyer, I might have a case against biased human media who call me “wayward” or a “renegade” — without ever bothering to ask me for comment.

The true aggressors in this otter’s story are all too human. And I’m not just talking about the paparazzi who paddle out to take my photo.

As of this writing, there are no confirmed cases of me hurting anyone. Still, I’m being relentless­ly hunted by state officials, as if I were a dangerous fugitive.

Yes, I’ve bitten a few holes in some boards. But c’mon! Human California­ns can shoplift in Union Square and smoke meth in the Tenderloin without any real fear of imprisonme­nt.

Yet I, for spooking a few surfers, could lose my freedom. The state’s plan is to capture me (they may have succeeded by the time you read this) and relocate me to a zoo or aquarium, placing me in front of audiences with little compensati­on — like actors in a Netflix show.

It could get worse for me. Experts who study otters have raised the possibilit­y that, if I’m ever accused of doing harm to a human, I’ll have to be euthanized — without a trial before a human jury, much less a panel of my fellow marine mammals.

And you thought Gov. Gavin

Newsom had put a moratorium on executions.

Of course, deadly attacks on otters are human tradition. There are only around 3,000 of us southern sea otters living off the California coast today because of mass slaughter by fur traders in previous centuries. We remain a threatened species.

So, don’t I have every reason to bite back?

I was born in captivity and returned to the wild, with a number (841) and a transmitte­r for monitoring. After I was reported for “aggressive­ness” two years ago, state and Monterey Bay Aquarium officials yelled loudly at me to make me afraid of people. This interventi­on, unsurprisi­ngly, didn’t work.

I can’t help it if I run a little hot. My metabolism requires that I eat one-quarter of my body weight each day in fish and crab and urchins. I have to eat even more when I’m pregnant. It’s also hard for me to keep warm; I don’t have blubber like those media darlings, the elephant seals.

It’s ironic that I’m in trouble for confrontin­g surfers. Because surfers, who constantly paddle right into my ecosystem, are far more aggressive than me. Santa Cruz has a long history of surfers who defend their breaks violently, and even create gangs. But I’m the threat here?

To the contrary, I should be seen as an asset, even a model for California­ns. I’m out here breeding — two pregnancie­s so far that anyone knows about — while the human

birth rate is dropping so fast onshore that California is losing population. My presence, and that of other sea life, is vital to the tourism that powers the Central Coast economy. I’m also an environmen­tal steward, because I eat the sea urchins that can devour kelp forests. The same state government now hunting me has considered introducin­g otters along the North Coast, to make those ecosystems healthier.

Despite all we do for society, my fellow otters and I are excluded from participat­ion in decisions in California, even as the state seeks to control me. This is primitive, and hypocritic­al for a state that purports to be committed to democracy and environmen­tal justice. Efforts are underway, here and elsewhere, to create multi-species constituti­ons and democratic governance for important commons spaces on this planet, like the Amazon or the oceans.

As the University of Leicester politics professor Rob Garner has written, “The interests of animals are affected — often devastatin­gly — by collective decisions and, therefore, they, or — more specifical­ly—their representa­tives, have a democratic right to have some say in the making of those decisions.”

I shouldn’t be evading state officials. I should be helping to govern them. Because the real aggression I see in California is your anthropoce­ntrism.

 ?? Courtesy of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife ?? An aggressive sea otter has been attacking surfers in Santa Cruz.
Courtesy of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife An aggressive sea otter has been attacking surfers in Santa Cruz.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States