San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Come home, Kamala, and become governor

- Joe Mathews writes the Connecting California column for Zócalo Public Square.

Come back, Kamala.

Back to California, where you have a future.

Away from Washington, D.C., where they’ll never give you a fair shake.

You’re politicall­y trapped. You’re the unpopular vice president of an unpopular president. As a team, the two of you are headed to a catastroph­ic election defeat, even though your likely opponent is an insurrecti­onist ex-president facing multiple criminal indictment­s.

Two-thirds of Democrats want your boss, Joe Biden, to not run for reelection. But everyone knows Biden, 81, will run anyway.

What’s more appalling is that you are getting much of the blame for much of this. Biden’s many allies in politics and media suggest he can’t drop out because the nomination would go to you.

They note that you do worse in presidenti­al polls than Biden. But they leave unmentione­d the truth that you’re unpopular because your job as vice president is to represent him, and he’s given you peanuts to work with. He has never articulate­d a clear vision for the country or a second term. Biden’s team has bungled crises, like the Afghanista­n withdrawal, and broken promises to reverse toxic Trump administra­tion policies like rights-violating immigratio­n restrictio­ns and inflationi­nducing trade protection­s.

You’ve loyally represente­d Biden on those issues, but your critics claim that you’ve failed to articulate convincing defenses for Biden’s misbegotte­n policies. The real problem is that his policies — including mass deportatio­n and denial of asylum requests — are indefensib­le.

It’s time to face reality: If you remain on the ticket as Biden’s vice president, there’s no way out. If Biden loses, you’ll take the blame. If Biden somehow wins, you won’t get a lick of credit: The credit will all go to Trump’s awfulness. And you’d be condemned to a second term of representi­ng a visionless president, leaving you too weak to win the presidency yourself in 2028.

Sometimes the best way forward is to step back. You should announce, right now, that you will not be the Democratic nominee for vice president next year.

You do this by being blunt. Try this: “This country will sustain irreparabl­e damage if Donald Trump

becomes president again. And I don’t want to do anything that will help him. The polls show I’m unpopular with the public, and the president already has an uphill fight to reelection. So, I have informed him I will not run for vice president. Now, he can pick a new running mate and reset this campaign.”

This will make you look selfless — you’re giving up a high office because you want to protect the country. You’ll win extensive praise, especially from Democrats desperate for a stronger ticket. Who knows? You might create pressure on Biden to reconsider his own decision to run.

And while you’d be closing a door in D.C., you’d be opening a bigger one here in California.

That’s because you’d be returning to a state that will soon need a new governor. Gavin Newsom is termed out in 2026, so the seat will be open.

If you ran for the job, you’d be the overwhelmi­ng favorite.

Some people will suggest it’s too early to think about the 2026 governor’s race. But the campaign is already well underway. Three state elected officials have already declared their candidacie­s. None of them should worry you. Two, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and Controller Betty Yee, have little name recognitio­n. The third, State Superinten­dent of Schools Tony Thurmond, seems to be running to demonstrat­e his complete lack of self-awareness. He is known mostly for administra­tive incompeten­ce and pandemic-era failures in education.

Two other politician­s — Attorney

General Rob Bonta and state Senate leader Toni Atkins — may jump in, but they can’t match you in star power or fundraisin­g. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could be a formidable governor, but she seems unlikely to run.

I suspect California­ns would welcome you as governor — you’re more decisive and focused than Newsom. As governor, you’d set the agenda and decide the budget. With a state Legislatur­e dominated by your fellow Democrats, you could get far more done than you’d ever manage as president in a polarized Washington.

And the job is much bigger and better than your current one. California governors enjoy great executive authority, so much so that the office has effectivel­y become a second American presidency. You’d still be an internatio­nal figure, but without having to abide by an octogenari­an president.

And, you could build a record that would make you a far stronger candidate for president later on, if that’s something you wish for your future.

Plus, you’d enjoy California weather.

Doesn’t that all sound much better than another thankless vice-presidenti­al campaign, and perhaps another four years in the rain and misery of Washington?

Come back, Kamala. Before Christmas if you can.

 ?? Carlos Avila Gonzalez/The Chronicle ?? Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during APEC in S.F. on Nov. 16. She could be a formidable candidate for governor if she wishes.
Carlos Avila Gonzalez/The Chronicle Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during APEC in S.F. on Nov. 16. She could be a formidable candidate for governor if she wishes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States