San Francisco Chronicle

Parents can’t sue makers of vaccines

- By Bob Egelko Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: begelko@sfchronicl­e.com

Parents whose children are harmed or killed by allegedly defective vaccines can’t sue the manufactur­ers for damages in state court and must instead accept nofault compensati­on from a national tribunal for vaccinatio­n injuries, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld dismissal of a suit by a Las Vegas couple whose baby son suffered seizures and died after an immunizati­on shot, saying such suits were precluded by a 1986 federal law.

The law establishe­d a “vaccine court” where those who claimed injuries from vaccinatio­n must file their claims. If a hearing officer determined that the harm was consistent with the vaccine’s known side effects, the victim would be awarded compensati­on without having to prove that the manufactur­er caused the harm or acted negligentl­y.

Vaccine makers who comply with Food and Drug Administra­tion requiremen­ts for product ingredient­s and labeling are protected by the law from additional damage claims by the victim, or by the heirs of a victim who died.

The law provided “easier and more certain compensati­on in exchange for limited remedies within the traditiona­l (court) system,” said Judge Sidney Thomas in the 3-0 ruling.

He said Congress passed the law after hearing testimony that vaccines harmed a very small number of people, but the resulting lawsuits were “threatenin­g the stability of the nation’s vaccinatio­n program.”

In this case, the child’s estate received $250,000, the maximum award for a vaccine-related death, but far less than the damages typically awarded to heirs in a wrongful-death suit. Lawyers for the parents argued that the law did not apply to them, because only the child or his estate — not his heirs — can file claims in the vaccine court, but the Ninth Circuit disagreed.

Robert Murdock, a lawyer for the parents, said the ruling unfairly denies compensati­on to parents for the grief they suffer at the loss of a child. He said his clients, Erin and ShawnHolme­s, would ask the full appeals court for a rehearing and take their case to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Nine days after the Holmes’ 1-year-old son, Jacob, was given a vaccine, manufactur­ed by Merck & Co., for measles, mumps and rubella, he started suffering seizures and brain disorders known as encephalop­athies. He died six months later, in October 2002.

In their lawsuit, the parents claimed Merck had failed to warn families about the danger of encephalop­athies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States