San Francisco Chronicle

Insuring a drone might make your head spin

- KATHLEEN PENDER

The Federal Aviation Administra­tion issued a rule last month that will make it easier to use unmanned aircraft systems — better known as drones — for commercial purposes such as aerial photograph­y, equipment inspection and news gathering.

Insuring your drone, however, is anything but simple. Drones pose myriad risks, including damage to the drone itself, to people or property hit by a drone and invasion of privacy claims.

Your homeowners or renters policy might — or might not — cover some or all of these risks if you’re flying a drone for fun, but it won’t cover business use. The Academy of Model Aeronautic­s provides drone insurance to members, but it also excludes commercial use.

If you use a drone to make money, your general business insurance might cover the drone itself, but you usually need a specific aviationli­ability policy to cover damage it inflicts on people or property.

The FAA has long allowed hobbyists to use drones for recreation­al purposes without authorizat­ion, but it has prohibited their use commercial­ly unless the operator obtained what’s known as a Section 333 exemption and operated under its strict guidelines. The FAA has granted more than 7,100 of these exemptions since September 2014, but the applicatio­n is complicate­d and there’s a processing backlog.

The new rule, dubbed Part 107, makes it legal to use drones under 55 pounds for commercial purposes without FAA authorizat­ion, as long as the pilot passes a test, registers the drone, flies it within sight during daylight hours below maximum altitude and speed limits, and follows other safety regulation­s.

The new rule does not deal with privacy issues, but the FAA says it is acting to address them. In the meantime, it encourages drone pilots “to check local and state laws before gathering informatio­n through remote sensing technology or photograph­y.”

More drones

Commercial drone use is expected to take off when the rule goes into effect Aug. 29. Insurance companies are expanding their offerings in this area. Some are using drones themselves to survey roofs and catastroph­e scenes.

San Francisco filmmaker Toby Harriman was using his drone for aerial photograph­y before a fireworks show on the Fourth of July in Colorado when it was shot down. “I think it was a group of drunk people on their deck having a party,” Harriman said. He filed a police report, but nothing came of it.

Fortunatel­y he had business insurance for his photograph­y equipment that covered the downed drone and camera. He filed a claim with Travelers Insurance, which agreed to pay him $3,900, after a $250 deductible. He got about the same amount when he lost a drone in Iceland this year.

Harriman is a bit concerned, because he has heard that if you file two drone claims, your policy might not get renewed. His business policy does not provide liability coverage for the drone, and he’s had trouble getting it.

For businesses, “a general liability policy would exclude anything associated with aviation, typically,” said Shawn Ram, a regional manager in San Francisco for insurance broker Crystal & Co.

Matthew Lavin, whose Santa Cruz company Aerography UAVs operates under a Section 333 exemption, said he is required to get at least $2 million in third-party aviation liability insurance when working through the California Film Commission. Some clients and venues want $5 million or more.

Businesses can get this specialty insurance from underwrite­rs such as AIG, Global Aerospace, Starr Insurance and Allianz.

Lavin’s broker, Transport Risk Management, placed him with Allianz. “I was vetted extremely hard,” he said.

Last year, he paid over $3,000 in premiums for two drones. One had $1 million in liability coverage, the other had $2 million. This year, prices have come down and he paid only $1,500, which also covered damage to one of the drones.

Global Aerospace charges around $800 to $900 a year for $1 million in liability insurance for “lighter drones,” said Chris Proudlove, a senior vice president with the insurer.

It also sells “hull coverage” for damage to the drone and equipment. For models in the $1,000 to $2,000 range, the annual premium is 5 to 10 percent of the insured value.

Proudlove said demand for aviation insurance is growing “at an incredible pace” in anticipati­on of the new rule. “As more and more commercial operators realize that the bar has been set pretty low in terms of what they can do, more commercial and public entities are looking to integrate drones.”

As with any type of insurance, you must read the exclusions carefully, and if you don’t understand them, talk to your agent. Most policies exclude damage caused by acts of war, which could include sabotage, which could include someone shooting down your drone.

Added coverage

Many commercial policies also exclude damage arising from technology failures, such as a cyberattac­k on a drone, Ram said. You can buy additional coverage for those risks.

For hobbyists, “the situation is very unclear,” Proudlove said. “It’s questionab­le as to whether homeowners would cover drone use.”

Most homeowners and renters policies “are silent” as to whether they cover drones, Ram said. If you operate a drone for recreation­al use, talk to your agent.

Colby Curtola, a San Francisco drone racer and instructor, has insurance through the Academy of Model Aeronautic­s. Membership in the Academy generally costs $75 per year and comes with $2.5 million in liability insurance for damage caused by drones. The policy also will pay up to $1,000 if a drone is lost, stolen or damaged, said Chad Budreau, a spokesman for the Academy. He could not say how many claims have been paid out under this policy.

“I think it was a group of drunk people on their deck having a party.” Toby Harriman, a San Francisco filmmaker whose drone was shot down before a fireworks show on the Fourth of July in Colorado

 ?? Connor Radnovich / The Chronicle ?? Mark Nano (left) and Colby Curtola compare drone designs before sending the crafts for flights at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco last week.
Connor Radnovich / The Chronicle Mark Nano (left) and Colby Curtola compare drone designs before sending the crafts for flights at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco last week.
 ??  ??
 ?? Photos by Connor Radnovich / The Chronicle ??
Photos by Connor Radnovich / The Chronicle
 ??  ?? Larry Davis, above, inspects his drone after it experience­d technical difficulti­es in flight at Golden Gate Park. Below, Colby Curtola controls his drone with the help of a headset.
Larry Davis, above, inspects his drone after it experience­d technical difficulti­es in flight at Golden Gate Park. Below, Colby Curtola controls his drone with the help of a headset.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States