San Francisco Chronicle

Muslim girls must swim with boys, court rules

- By Dan Bilefsky Dan Bilefsky is a New York Times writer.

In 2008, school officials in Basel, Switzerlan­d, ordered a Muslim couple to enroll their daughters in a mandatory swimming class, despite the parents’ objections to having their girls learn alongside boys.

The officials offered the couple some accommodat­ions: The girls, who were around the ages of 9 and 11, could wear body-covering swimsuits, known as burkinis, during the swimming lessons, and they could undress for the class without any boys present.

But the parents refused to send their daughters to the lessons, and in 2010 the officials imposed a fine of about $1,380. The parents, Aziz Osmanoglu and Sehabat Kocabas, who have both Swiss and Turkish nationalit­y, decided to sue.

On Tuesday, the European Court of Human Rights upheld the Swiss officials’ decision, rejecting the parents’ argument that Swiss authoritie­s had violated the “freedom of thought, conscience and religion” guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights, which the court enforces.

“The public interest in following the full school curriculum should prevail over the applicants’ private interest in obtaining an exemption from mixed swimming lessons for their daughters,” the court found.

The case was the latest to pit freedom of religion against the imperative of social integratio­n, and to raise the question of whether — and how much — the government should accommodat­e the religious views of Muslim citizens and residents, many of them immigrants.

The ruling could set an important precedent in other cases in which religious and secular values or norms come into conflict.

The parents have three months to appeal the court’s decision.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States