San Francisco Chronicle

PG&E progress:

- By David R. Baker David R. Baker is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: dbaker@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @DavidBaker­SF

Despite a series of power and equipment failures, the utility has made strides against disruption­s.

Hard as it may have been for San Franciscan­s to believe Friday, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. has made steady, substantia­l progress in cutting the number and length of blackouts that its customers endure.

Stung by a series of outages and dramatic equipment failures in its San Francisco hometown — including a 2003 substation fire that cut power to one-third of the city — PG&E spent the last decade upgrading its equipment.

And that effort has produced results.

The average PG&E customer lost power 1.02 times in 2016, according to data compiled by the utility. In 2006, blackouts hit the average PG&E customer 1.45 times.

Similarly, the average customer lost power for 109 minutes in 2016. While more than an hour and a half may sound like a long time, it’s a big improvemen­t from 2006, when the average PG&E customer went without electricit­y for 3¼ hours.

Those figures exclude major weather-related events.

The statistics may come as cold comfort to those in the 88,000 San Francisco homes and businesses that lost electricit­y in the blackout that started just after 9 a.m. Friday.

PG&E blamed the outage on a fire at an electrical substation that the utility planned to refurbish next year.

“We’ve identified it as a substation that needed to be updated,” said Barry Anderson, PG&E’s vice president of electric distributi­on, at a news conference Friday. “It just is a case where the equipment failed before we could get to the update.”

While more public attention has focused on PG&E’s natural gas network in the wake of the deadly 2010 San Bruno explosion, the utility’s electricit­y infrastruc­ture also has a history of highly visible failures.

In June 2009, a power line from the 1920s melted inside a vault beneath Polk and O’Farrell streets, starting a fire that shot flames 30 feet into the air and knocked out power to 8,600 customers.

In August 2005, a transforme­r exploded beneath a sidewalk in the city's Financial District, shattering windows and severely burning a woman who was walking nearby.

And in December 2003, a fire in a Mission District substation blacked out large swaths of the city, with some customers waiting more than 24 hours for electricit­y to return.

But PG&E has been swapping out old equipment and adding new gear that can spot and isolate blackouts quickly. As a result, the number and duration of outages striking PG&E’s system have declined.

PG&E use to consistent­ly suffer more blackouts than the state’s other large, investor-owned utilities, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric. But, in 2015, the latest year for which data from all three companies are available, PG&E had improved its standing compared to its corporate peers.

In 2015, Edison experience­d blackouts at a rate of 0.92 per customer, slightly worse than PG&E’s performanc­e of 0.87 per customer. The San Diego utility, meanwhile, reported 0.53 per customer that year.

Edison’s average customer lost power for 115 minutes in 2015, while SDG&E’s average customer went without electricit­y for 58 minutes. PG&E’s average customer lost electricit­y for 96 minutes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States