San Francisco Chronicle

Google gold mine below the search bar

Ads atop query results prove most profitable on Web

- By Daisuke Wakabayash­i

Before Sergey Brin and Larry Page founded Google, they wrote a research paper as doctoral students at Stanford University in which they questioned the appropriat­eness of ads on search engines.

“It could be argued from the consumer point of view that the better the search engine is, the fewer advertisem­ents will be needed for the consumer to find what they want,” the pair wrote in the 1998 paper.

How times change. Two decades later, it’s not unusual for a smartphone user to see only ads on a Google search page before scrolling down to the regular results.

When Google’s parent company, Alphabet, reports earnings this week, the Mountain View company’s substantia­l profits are expected to demonstrat­e yet again that the billboard space accompanyi­ng Google queries is the Web’s most valuable real estate for advertisem­ents.

In the 17 years since Google introduced text advertisin­g above search results, the company has allocated more space to ads and created new forms of them. The ad creep on Google has pushed “organic” (unpaid) search results farther down the screen, an effect even more pronounced on the smaller displays of smartphone­s.

The changes are profound for retailers and brands that rely on leads from Google searches to drive online sales. With limited space available near the top of search results, not advertisin­g on search terms

associated with your brand or displaying images of your products is tantamount to telling potential customers to spend their money elsewhere.

The biggest developmen­t with search ads is the proliferat­ion of product listing ads. In a departure from its text ads, Google started allowing retailers to post pictures, descriptio­ns and prices of products at the top of search results in 2009.

In recent years, Google has served more product ads and expanded their availabili­ty to more general search terms — for example, showing photo ads on a search for “running shoes,” not just “Nike Air Max.” It has also tinkered with the size, location and number of ads on results pages for both computers and smartphone­s.

Retailers are snapping up product ads. They accounted for 52 percent of all Google search ad spending by retailers in the first quarter of 2017, versus 8 percent in 2011, according to the digital marketing agency Merkle.

Having the ads “takes the search engine results page to a different level,” said Andy Taylor, Merkle’s associate director of research.

A Google spokeswoma­n said the company’s goal had always been to quickly give people the best search results.

“Our goal has always been to deliver results that people find immediatel­y useful, which is even more important on mobile devices with smaller screens,” said the spokeswoma­n, Chi Hea Cho. “For most queries, we show no ads, and we recently removed righthand text ads for all queries. For highly commercial queries, our extensive testing shows that people find relevant ads and offers extremely useful.”

The importance of being at the top of search results is fueling fierce competitio­n for ads. Reef, a beachwear manufactur­er best known for its sandals, said it increased spending with Google 76 percent last year — mainly because it nearly quadrupled the money it put into product ads.

On a search result, Reef is competing with other manufactur­ers of flipflops, as well as retail partners selling Reef sandals. On a desktop computer, a Google search for “Reef flipflops” brought back three text ads above the search results — one from Reef, one from Zappos and one from Amazon — selling Reef sandals. There were also nine image product listing ads displaying different Reef sandals for sale; only three were offered by reef.com while the rest were from other retailers.

On a mobile phone, Reef is competing with even more retailers. The same search brought back only Reef ’s text ad, but below a scrolling carousel featuring more than 20 image ads for different types of Reef flip-flops. Only the first two images linked to reef.com.

“We’re competing against each other,” Jessica Levens, director of e-commerce at Reef, said about the company’s retail partners. “We need to spend the dollars to defend that real estate.”

Levens said the advertisin­g strategy was effective, although she had to convince her chief financial officer about the wisdom of spending more. Those product campaigns helped triple sales that started from online queries, including instances where customers searched without including the Reef brand name.

Google’s prospectin­g for ad sales has not been limited to the product listing ads. The company has introduced new forms of search advertisin­g for automobile­s, hotels and even home services such as plumbing.

“It’s impossible to rely simply on organic” search, said Caitlin Aylward, a senior associate at L2, a research and advisory firm for consumer brands. “The winner in all this is Google.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States