San Francisco Chronicle

Delays mount for calorie count

- By Mary Clare Jalonick Mary Clare Jalonick is an Associated Press writer.

WASHINGTON — Consumers hoping to consistent­ly find out how many calories are in that burger and fries may have to wait — again.

New government rules to help people find out how many calories are in their restaurant meals are set to go into effect this week after years of delays. But they could be pushed back again if grocery stores, convenienc­e stores and pizza delivery chains get their way.

Originally passed as part of the health care overhaul in 2010, the law requires restaurant­s and other establishm­ents that sell prepared foods and have 20 or more locations to post the calorie content of food “clearly and conspicuou­sly” on their menus, menu boards and displays. The delays have come as those businesses that never wanted to be part of the law say it is burdensome and have fiercely lobbied against it.

Facing a May 5 compliance deadline set by the Food and Drug Administra­tion last year, those groups are eyeing a massive spending bill that Congress will have to pass in the next week to keep the government open. They’re hoping to either delay the menu labeling rules again or include legislatio­n in the larger bill that would revise the law and make it easier for some businesses to comply.

At the same time, the FDA is signaling it may act on the issue even sooner. In a typical first step before a rule or decision is announced, the agency has sent language to the White House for review that would delay the compliance date.

A delay would be the latest of many. The FDA took more than four years to write the rules, and establishm­ents originally had until the end of 2015 to comply. That was pushed to 2016 and then to May 2017.

The idea behind the menu labeling law is that people may pass on that bacon double cheeseburg­er at a chain restaurant, hot dog at a gas station or large popcorn at the movie theater if they know that it has hundreds of calories. But grocery stores and convenienc­e stores have said the rules would be more burdensome for them than they would be for restaurant­s, which typically have more limited offerings and a central ordering point. The majority of prepared foods in grocery stores will have to be labeled — from the salad bar to the hot food bar to cookies in the bakery.

The industry groups are backing legislatio­n by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., that would narrow labeling requiremen­ts for supermarke­ts by allowing stores to use a menu or menu board in a prepared foods area instead of putting labels on individual items. It would also allow restaurant­s like pizza chains that receive most of their orders remotely to post calories online instead of at the retail location, as the rules now require.

McMorris Rodgers, a member of House leadership, has been pushing for her legislatio­n to be included in the spending bill. But if it’s not included, a delay by the FDA could give Congress the needed time to pass it.

With the nutritionm­inded Barack Obama administra­tion out of office and President Trump promising to repeal burdensome regulation­s, the groups think they may have a chance to win some concession­s on the law. Jon Taets of the National Associatio­n of Convenienc­e Stores says his group is doing “a full-court press” to get some changes.

The American Pizza Community, an advocacy group for pizza companies, is also pushing for a revision. They say the FDA rules, which require menu boards in the restaurant­s, don’t make any sense because most of their customers don’t come into the store.

Nutrition advocates who worked closely with the Obama administra­tion say the rules should go forward. Margo Wootan, a lobbyist at the Center for Science and the Public Interest who helped negotiate the original legislatio­n with the restaurant industry, says the rules are important because people get a third of their calories from eating out, and restaurant portions tend to be larger.

The National Restaurant Associatio­n also came out against a delay Thursday, saying a patchwork of state laws would be “even more burdensome.” Many restaurant­s have already posted the calorie labels, but aren’t required to until this week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States