San Francisco Chronicle

Facebook fights campaigns that spread lies to trick public

- By Sarah Frier

Fraudsters spreading falsehoods on social media are getting more sophistica­ted. Facebook says it’s rising to the challenge. The owner of the world’s most used social network is focusing on organizati­ons that release coordinate­d campaigns to sway political opinion and spread lies by way of fake accounts.

As Facebook’s network grows and becomes a forum for political debate, some organizati­ons have been taking advantage maliciousl­y, including during the elections in the U.S. and France, the company said in a white paper posted Thursday by its top security executives. Facebook says it has a responsibi­lity to act when users are being manipulate­d, through a new category of attack it calls “informatio­n operations.”

“We’ve had to expand our security focus from traditiona­l abusive behavior, such as account hacking, malware, spam and financial scams, to include more subtle and insidious forms of misuse,” the company said, “including attempts to manipulate civic discourse and deceive people.”

Organizati­ons seeking to sway public opinion tailor their techniques to Facebook’s requiremen­t that people use real identities. Some of the bad actors create

accounts using the names and photos of real people and then send friend requests to a person’s actual network, the company said. Others are stealing passwords or personal informatio­n to take over authentic accounts.

The company says that many of these accounts are not fully automated, but coordinate­d by people who are dedicated to operating many of them at once. They synchroniz­e their responses to content, such as through “likes” and other postings, often in many places at once. Sometimes the reactions are repetitive or constitute harassment. The people in charge of the accounts may use them to make Facebook groups where they can spread false informatio­n, manipulate photos and create inflammato­ry memes. “Sometimes these pages include legitimate and unrelated content, ostensibly to deflect from their purpose,” Facebook said.

As the actors become more sophistica­ted and humanlike, Facebook is working to train its detection tools. Improvemen­ts to Facebook’s system, for example, can help it identify a spike in content from a group of accounts, or if someone is repeatedly posting the same thing. Facebook said the improved tools helped it take down more than 30,000 accounts during the election in France this month.

Informatio­n operations took place during the U.S. presidenti­al election, too, Facebook said. In some cases, people used fake accounts to amplify unspecifie­d stolen data “with the intent of harming the reputation of specific political targets,” the company said, without elaboratin­g.

Once fake accounts posted erroneous informatio­n, it was “inevitable” that legitimate people continued to spread the message through their own networks. Still, Facebook says the impact was statistica­lly small. “The reach of the content shared by false amplifiers was marginal compared to the overall volume of civic content shared during the U.S. election,” the company said.

Facebook determines whether an account is authentic based on activity, and not on the content of posts. As the company fights the spread of fake news on its platform, executives have said it wants to steer clear of being an arbiter of truth. “Facebook sits at a critical juncture,” the company said. “Not everyone shares our vision, and some will seek to undermine it — but we are in a position to help constructi­vely shape the emerging informatio­n ecosystem by ensuring our platform remains a safe and secure environmen­t for civic engagement.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States