San Francisco Chronicle

City should focus on young homeless

- By Sherilyn Adams and Mary Kate Bacalao Sherilyn Adams is executive director and Mary Kate Bacalao is director of public funding for Larkin Street Youth Services.

Why did the Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t choose San Francisco as a demonstrat­ion site to end youth homelessne­ss? HUD’s Youth Homelessne­ss Demonstrat­ion Program is a pilot for 10 communitie­s nationwide, and more than 150 of them applied for grants like the $2.9 million that HUD awarded San Francisco in January.

One reason is that San Francisco pairs tremendous potential with staggering need. An estimated 21 percent of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss in San Francisco are youth and young adults under 25, and 89 percent of them are unsheltere­d, making San Francisco the nation’s city with the highest percentage of unsheltere­d youth and young adults. Our local policymake­rs are parents as well as politician­s, and we should all agree that it is a public crisis and a moral outrage for college-age people to spend their time and energy surviving in the streets without a safe place to sleep.

Fortunatel­y, local momentum is growing to make gamechangi­ng investment­s in housing. The Tipping Point Community’s $100 million effort to cut chronic homelessne­ss in half will also cut public costs by housing those who would otherwise cycle expensivel­y between our sidewalks and our public systems. The Heading Home Campaign’s $30 million private-public partnershi­p to end family homelessne­ss by 2019 will resolve homelessne­ss for 800 families who would otherwise live in shelters or the streets.

As a homeless service provider, we celebrate these key investment­s leveraging our city-funded programs with the resources (and resourcefu­lness) of private-sector partners. As a youth service provider, we call on the city to make a greater investment in youth, and to leverage that investment with state general funds and ballot measures, as well as private-public partnershi­ps.

If we underinves­t in youthspeci­fic programs — or make adult-centered investment­s that impact youth derivative­ly — then our unsheltere­d young people will simply age into adult homelessne­ss. And we will have perpetuate­d the problems we set out to solve. Ending adult homelessne­ss is a shortterm Band-Aid if we don’t talk about ending youth homelessne­ss as a long-term prevention mechanism.

How should San Francisco end youth homelessne­ss? The $2.9 million HUD award is the public-sector equivalent of a seed round. It’s a cash infusion that must be leveraged with other resources as part of a multiyear, multi-sector partnershi­p. The HUD money is a springboar­d: It is not a solution. We need a targeted mix of investment­s to protect the generation of young people squeezed between the postrecess­ion boom and our housing affordabil­ity crisis.

Supervisor Jeff Sheehy recognized this when he called a public hearing on youth homelessne­ss last week. Together with Supervisor­s Sandra Lee Fewer and Hillary Ronen, he heard testimony on disparitie­s in how the city spends its resources. The Youth Commission, for example, recommende­d that reauthoriz­ed Children’s Fund dollars be proportion­ally applied to “transition-age youth” (18-24). This would quadruple the current investment to $10 million. Ronen reiterated the board’s unanimous support for a youth navigation center and pressed for resources to make it a reality.

The travesty is that youth are sleeping in the streets — or making choices forced by predators to avoid the streets entirely — because we’re not investing proportion­ately to meet their distinct needs. The homeless department’s mayoral mandate is to end homelessne­ss for key “subpopulat­ions”: adults, including families and veterans, and young people. Solutions-focused talk about ending homeless must make youth an equal part of the public conversati­on — and a proportion­ate share of the budget. Otherwise, we’re sinking costs, not saving futures.

We know what we need to end youth homelessne­ss, and in an era of shifting federal priorities, we cannot expect HUD to do the work for us. We have decade-old recommenda­tions from the Transition-Age Youth Task Force for a housing plan. These strategies aren’t getting any younger, and neither are our young people. It’s time to invest in ending homelessne­ss, by ending youth homelessne­ss.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States