San Francisco Chronicle

Supes to vote on fraudulent evictions bill

- — J.K. Dineen

Dueling pieces of legislatio­n designed to crack down on fraudulent evictions by landlords were largely reconciled on Monday by city supervisor­s, who moved a compromise version of the bills to the full board for a vote on Tuesday.

The competing bills, introduced separately by moderate Supervisor Mark Farrell and progressiv­e Supervisor Aaron Peskin, both sought to curb unlawful owner move-in evictions, in which landlords kick out tenants under the pretense of occupying a dwelling themselves, but instead rent the unit to someone else — often at a higher price.

Both bills sought to compel landlords to declare, under penalty of perjury, that they or a family member would occupy the property for at least three continuous years, along with a number of additional reporting requiremen­ts. Illegal evictions are estimated to occur in as many as 25 percent of all owner move-ins, Peskin said Monday at the supervisor­s land use committee meeting.

But the bills diverged when it came to how the city would enforce the new rules. And the fight over precisely how to hold fraudulent landlords accountabl­e was expected to spill into discussion Tuesday.

The bills also diverged when it came to legal action. Peskin’s bill, cosponsore­d by Supervisor

sought to Jane Kim, allow private nonprofit groups to sue allegedly fraudulent landlords on behalf of evicted tenants if the city attorney’s office chose not to sue. Farrell disagreed with that proposal, believing tenants should bring the suits — under Peskin’s version a third-party could bring a suit even without the consent of the tenant. The third-party provision didn’t survive Monday but is likely to resurface Tuesday.

Despite the lingering disagreeme­nts over enforcemen­t, Peskin said in a statement sent through a spokeswoma­n that he was “pleased that Supervisor Farrell has adopted roughly 70 percent of my legislatio­n verbatim — we are all hoping that the Board of Supervisor­s will go the final mile to make this legislatio­n as strong as possible.”

— Dominic Fracassa Preserving the El Rey: The El Rey Theater on Ocean Avenue took another step toward obtaining landmark status on Monday.

The Board of Supervisor­s Land Use Committee voted unanimousl­y to designate the classic Art Deco theater as a city landmark, a key step in making the property eligible for federal and state historic preservati­on tax incentives that will help pay for the renovation of the building.

“We can’t imagine Ocean Avenue or most of the west side without the iconic presence of the El Rey,” said Jen Low , an aide to Supervisor Norman Yee.

The landmark designatio­n, which goes next to the full Board of Supervisor­s for final approval, comes as new ownership is giving fans of the 1931 theater renewed hope it will be brought back to life.

The theater, designed by Timothy Pflueger, closed in 1977 and was bought by the Voice of the Pentecost church, which also operated a small school there. In December 2015, a group of investors from Marin bought the property in a trustee sale on the steps of City Hall for $1.06 million. The seller was the Stanford Federal Credit Union, which had foreclosed on the property after the church defaulted on a loan. The buyer was a joint venture between Ricci Ventures and Green Point Land Co., both Marin investment groups.

While the owners have not yet filed an applicatio­n to redevelop the property, they are exploring a mix of retail, arts and, possibly, housing. The owners have reached out to theater groups to gauge interest.

Architect John Goldman, who is working on the renovation for the property owners, said the new owners are “very much behind the landmarkin­g.”

Chris VerPlanck , an architectu­re historian who wrote the report for the landmark status, said a refurbishe­d El Rey would “serve as an anchor of the improving Ocean Avenue corridor” just as the Castro Theatre serves as centerpiec­e of that neighborho­od.

“This part of town doesn’t have many city landmarks,” said VerPlanck. “OMI (Ocean View, Merced Heights, and Ingleside) has two and West of Twin Peaks only has two.”

Email: @cityinside­r@ sfchronicl­e.com, dfracassa @sfchronicl­e.com, jdineen @sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @sfcityinsi­der, @dominickfr­acassa, @sfjkdineen

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States